Scipedia Scipedia
    • Library
    • Groups

    Documents published in 2025

    • Numerical Investigation of the Aerodynamic Performance of Rigid Wing Sails with Eppler 61 airfoils.

      R. Bardera, Á. Rodriguez-Sevillano, J. Matías, E. Barroso, J. Fernández
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • Optimizing Wing Sails with Actuator Line Simulations and an Effective Angle of Attack Controller

      J. Kramer*
      Marine 2025.

      • 6
      •  read
    • A Study on Improving Rotor Sail Performance through Flow Control of the Upper Deck Structure of a Ship

      J. Kim*, W. Oh, S. Choi
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • Cavitating flow past a circular cylinder in the Drag Crisis Regime

      V. Massip*, B. Lescanne, P. Bot
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • Investigation of Validation Method for Twisted Hydrofoils in Cavitating Flow

      S. ÖKSÜZ*, O. USTA, F. Çelik
      Marine 2025.

      • 58
      •  read
    • Control of tip vortices for a hydrofoil through grooved tip treatment

      J. Tan*, S. Otomo, I. Viola, Y. Liu
      Marine 2025.

      • 150
      •  read
    • Full-Scale Measurements of a Propeller Tip Vortex Cavity and its Broadband Noise

      F. Berge*, R. Schouten, J. Carpentier, J. Bosschers
      Marine 2025.

      • 8
      •  read
    • CFD Prediction of Tip Vortex Cavitation Inception on a Hydrofoil

      K. Shin*, M. Kim, J. Hong, B. Ahn, J. Nielsen
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Accelerating Level-3 Fitness-For-Service Assessments for Pipeline Metal Loss Using Machine Learning

      B. Bayik, H. Ragheb*, G. Varelis
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • Structural Design of Float-over Type Fixed Offshore Platforms – A Disruptive Method Using Knowledge-based and AI-aided Technique

      P. Chatterjee*
      Marine 2025.

      • 3
      •  read
    • Gust Estimation and Rejection for Underwater Craft with Morphing Control Surfaces

      T. Cook*, L. Micklem, H. Dong, Y. Yang, M. Mistry, F. Giorgio-Ser
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • Data-Driven Approach To Develop a Multiphase Meter From The Flow Induced Vibration In Subsea Jumpers

      G. Carvalho, U. Hasan, E. Pereyra, J. Mesa*
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • Development of Efficient Numerical Models for Digital Twins and Active Control of Floating Wind Turbines

      J. Fontaine, R. Hashemi, B. Knight*, S. Grilli
      Marine 2025.

      • 5
      •  read
    • Machine Learning for Ocean Wave Height Estimation

      M. Levine*, S. Edwards
      Marine 2025.

      • 7
      •  read
    • Study on residual mechanical properties of EAF marine steel under corrosion for circular economy in offshore structures

      Y. Huang, H. Zhang, N. Ringas*
      Marine 2025.

      • 8
      •  read
    • Physical-data driven hybrid modelling for structural optimization of buckling resistance of wind turbine blades bio-inspired by beetle elytron

      S. Dai, Y. Wang, X. Zhou, Y. Liu, X. Zhang*
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Low-cycle Fatigue of Welded Steel Components for Offshore Structures

      I. Gavriilidis*, T. Papatheocharis, S. Karamanos
      Marine 2025.

      • 8
      •  read
    • High-Frequency Mechanical Impact Effect on High-Cycle Fatigue of Welded Steel Connections for Offshore Structures

      C. Mourlas*, T. Papatheocharis, I. Gavriilidis, S. Karamanos
      Marine 2025.

      • 10
      •  read
    • Hybrid FRP-Concrete-Steel Double-Skin Solutions for Sustainable Offshore Wind Support Structures

      R. Deng*, T. Yu, Z. Zhang
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • The role of Uncoupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (UEL) approach in UNDEX investigations for ship-like structures

      J. Bardiani*, G. Kyaw Oo D'Amore, C. Sbarufatti, A. Manes
      Marine 2025.

      • 14
      •  read
    • Numerical Analysis of DARPA SUBOFF Submarine for Self-Propulsion using ANSYS Fluent GPU Solver

      A. Khaware*, F. Kelecy, R. Harding, L. Munholand
      Marine 2025.

      • 3
      •  read
    • Manoeuvring performance prediction of a bulk carrier using numerical methods

      S. Sezen*, C. Zegos, A. Gibbins
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • Propeller and Rudder Interaction in Large-Amplitude Waves

      E. Heilshorn*, B. Knight, K. Silva, K. Maki
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • 6-DOF Simulation of High-Speed Boat Maneuvering

      C. Wang*, M. Nader, K. Stambaugh, L. Leibman
      Marine 2025.

      • 0
      •  read
    • A Data-Driven Method for Performance Evaluation of Wind-Assisted Ship Propulsion

      K. Maki, P. Geremia*, B. Di Paolo
      Marine 2025.

      • 12
      •  read
    • RANS-based Manoeuvring Performance Prediction for Under-actuated Marine Vehicle, Underwater Glider

      V. Durai*, Y. Song, Y. Xu, W. Wang, W. Shi
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • ONRT Free-Running CFD and System Based Simulations for Transient Maneuvers

      C. Milano*, Y. Sanada, Z. Wang, S. Toxopeus, F. Stern
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • Skin Friction Drag Predictions for Fouling-control Coatings and Biofouling Roughness: A Computational Approach with RANS Model

      C. Lee*, H. Chen
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • The Origin of the Out-of-Dry-Dock Drag Penalty of a Ship

      J. Monty*, J. Will, I. Aliman, B. Nugroho, H. Hendriyadi, T. Muli
      Marine 2025.

      • 6
      •  read
    • The Roughness Induced Drag-Penalty of an Operational Ship

      N. Hutchins*, J. Will, I. Aliman, B. Nugroho, H. Hendriyadi, T. Mulia, K. Suastika, K. Utama, J. Monty, M. Schultz
      Marine 2025.

      • 10
      •  read
    • The hydrodynamics of soft-fouling

      N. Beratlis*, E. Balaras
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Characterisation of the Imprint of Roughness Topography on the Near-wall Flow Using the Blanketing Layer Concept

      A. Busse*, O. Zhdanov
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • Data-driven tools for interpretation of roughness effects on turbulent flows

      S. Dalpke, J. Yang, B. Frohnapfel, S. Bagheri, P. Forooghi, A. Stroh
      Marine 2025.

      • 5
      •  read
    • RANS modelling of heterogeneous roughness

      M. Arukalava Seshasayee*, A. Attili, M. Schultz, P. Hamblett, I. Viola
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • Ship Biofouling Drag Penalty Prediction with the Wind-shade Roughness Model

      K. Womack, M. Schultz*
      Marine 2025.

      • 6
      •  read
    • Reducing Biofilms and the Associated Drag Penalties: Studies into the Impact of UVC Applications for Dynamically Grown Marine Biofilms

      K. Hunsucker*, G. Franklin, M. Tate, M. Schultz, T. Hunsucker
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • Parametrization of the drag and turbulent intensities over rough walls

      F. Bruno*, M. De Marchis, S. Leonardi
      Marine 2025.

      • 5
      •  read
    • The path from homogeneous to heterogeneous roughness drag models

      R. Jensen, J. Yang, A. Stroh, B. Frohnapfel, S. Bagheri, P. Foroo
      Marine 2025.

      • 6
      •  read
    • The friction coefficient of heterogeneously rough surfaces

      C. Schmidt*, D. Gatti, S. Dalpke, J. Neuhauser, B. Frohnapfel
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • A Novel Application of Attention U-Net for Marine Biofouling Classification and Segmentation

      O. Bourchas*, I. Karlatiras, G. Papalambrou
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • Non-equilibrium effects on rough-wall turbulent boundary layers

      B. Ganapathisubramani*, T. Preskett, M. Formichetti, D. Wangsawij
      Marine 2025.

      • 14
      •  read
    • Computational modelling to predict flow induced marine biofilm deformation and detachment

      Y. Xia, J. Dawson, J. Longyear, J. Chen*
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Data-driven Reduced Order Modeling for Accelerating Naval Design and Optimization

      N. Demo*, G. Rozza
      Marine 2025.

      • 6
      •  read
    • Development of a 2D Potential Flow Reduced-Order Numerical Method for the Analysis of Forces and Pressure Fields around Multiple Moving Objects or Cascades

      D. Brito*, L. Eça, J. Baltazar
      Marine 2025.

      • 6
      •  read
    • Predictive digital twins of civil engineering structures and adaptive planning to account for rare events

      M. Tezzele*
      Marine 2025.

      • 10
      •  read
    • Data-driven Parameterization Refinement for the Structural Optimization of Cruise Ship Hulls

      L. Fabris*, M. Tezzele, G. Rozza
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • Comparison with Different Bayesian and non-Bayesian Estimation Techniques for the Compound Rayleigh Exponential Distribution with Actuarial Measures and Applications

      I. Alkhairy, H. Alsuhabi
      Rev. int. métodos numér. cálc. diseño ing. (2025). Vol. Online First, 75

      Abstract

      Many lifetime analysis, such as engineering, biology, survival, actuarial and medical sciences, heavily rely on the two-parameter compound Rayleigh exponential distribution, which is well-known in statistical theory. Because of their ability to successfully handle small sample sizes and involve prior knowledge, Bayesian techniques are crucial for estimating the parameters of the compound Rayleigh exponential distribution. This study presents the estimation of the compound Rayleigh exponential distribution unknown parameters using Bayesian and non-Bayesian estimation techniques, including maximum likelihood estimation, maximum product spacing, least square estimator, weighted least square estimator, Cramer-Von-Mise estimator, Anderson-Darling estimator, and Bayesian techniques with informative and non-informative priors based on different loss functions. Additionally, we used several methods to obtain the confidence intervals for the unknown parameters, such as the approximate and Bootstrap methods. The effectiveness of these estimators is evaluated through a Monte Carlo simulation study. Furthermore, we are committed to investigating three widely recognized risk metrics: the value at risk, the tail value at risk, and the tail variance premium. These findings are helpful for actuarial risk researchers who depend on risk measurement fitting when evaluating Bayesian tools for effectively modeling actuarial sciences. Finally, different applications taken from several areas are examined to illustrate the practical usefulness of the compound Rayleigh exponential distribution. Using various model selection criteria, the introduced model is contrasted with that of several well-known distributions. Our empirical findings indicate that the suggested model has superior goodness-of-fit to the other models examined.

      Abstract
      Many lifetime analysis, such as engineering, biology, survival, actuarial and medical sciences, heavily rely on the two-parameter compound Rayleigh exponential distribution, [...]

      • 87
      •  read
    • Evaluation of conventional behavior of bitumen containing PET plastic and HMA pavement response utilizing 3D-Move analysis software

      N. Tessera, E. Quezon
      Journal (2025). Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Project Management (JSCMPM)

      Abstract

      A well-developed road network provides good services for road consumers. Most roads in the world are paved with flexible materials. Bitumen has viscous-elastic properties and is very sensitive to temperature. It plays a vital role in producing hot mix asphalt and influences the performance of HMA pavement. Flexible pavements are associated with extreme temperatures, which can cause rutting and fatigue cracking. Pavement distress shortens service life and increases maintenance costs. This research focused on improving pavement resistance to distress by modifying bitumen's conventional properties with alternative materials, such as shredded PET plastic. In this study, two stages were applied. The first stage was collecting samples, and the second stage determined the conventional properties of bitumen by adding 3%, 6%, and 9% of shredded PET plastic to the bitumen. Penetration, ductility, and softening point tests were performed to analyze the conventional behavior of bitumen. Finally, top-down and bottom-up cracks are used to evaluate rutting damage, with 3D-Move analysis software that accounts for moving vehicles under various loads and speeds. From the conventional bitumen test, adding 3% PET plastic to the bitumen has no significant effect on penetration grade, Ductility, or softening point. However, when 6% and 9% PET by weight of bitumen mixed, the penetration grade, ductility, and softening result become 49.3mm, 45.5mm, 97mm, 85mm, and 57mm and 62oC, respectively compared with the penetration grade, ductility, and softening point value of unmodified bitumen (66.5mm, 142cm, and 48.9oC). Besides, the 3D-Move Analysis software results show that asphalt binders with higher PET plastic content best resist rutting, top-down cracking, and bottom cracks.

      Abstract
      A well-developed road network provides good services for road consumers. Most roads in the world are paved with flexible materials. Bitumen has viscous-elastic properties [...]

      • 17
      •  read
    • Evaluation of classical and machine-learning based wall-models for wall-modeled LES (WMLES) in view of ship hydrodynamics

      M. Münsch*, S. Manjunath, V. Rao, E. Mohamadi Bagheri, P. Schlatt
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Self-Similarity Analysis of Turbulent Wake Behind the DARPA Suboff

      K. He, W. Zhao*, D. Wan
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Towards scale-resolving simulations of raceboat hydrofoils

      T. Mukha*, M. Parsani
      Marine 2025.

      • 8
      •  read
    • Wake interaction for different tandem vertical axis wind turbine types

      I. Marinić-Kragić*, D. Vucina, I. Pehnec
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Hydrodynamic analysis of a 2MW offshore floating solar farm with breakwater protection

      T. Bunnik*, J. van der Anden, N. Baderiya
      Marine 2025.

      • 3
      •  read
    • Effects of nacelle and tower on the wake recovery of a hydrokinetic turbine

      R. Broglia*, A. Posa, I. Viola
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Experimental testing of glass fibre/epoxy resin composite bow foil demonstrators for ships

      Y. Jiang*, C. Kelly, D. Flatharta, O. Sam-Daliri, T. Flanagan, J. Goggins, W. Finnegan
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Numerical Modelling of Friction in Passively Pitching Blades for Tidal Turbines

      K. Frankowski*, P. Sunil, A. Young, R. Broglia, E. McCarthy, M. O’Sullivan, I. Viola
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Visco-elasto-plastic behaviour law of a Polyamide 6 floating wind turbine mooring line based on long-term creep tests

      J. Laurent*, L. Civier, Y. Marco, G. Bles
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • Genetic Algorithms for the Control Co-Design of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generators for Wave Energy Converters

      M. Onslow*, A. Stock
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Mooring Lines Multi-component Analysis using OpenFOAM

      T. Almeida-Medina*, J. Calderón-Sánchez, V. Díaz-Casás
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • CFD-based analysis and sensitivity study of a two-body hinged raft wave energy converter

      G. Kovacs*, Y. Shao, R. Bloom, J. Walther
      Marine 2025.

      • 8
      •  read
    • PSO-Based Framework for Preliminary Jacket Substructure Design in Offshore Wind Applications

      B. Benítez Suárez*, R. Quevedo Reina, G. Álamo Meneses, L. Padrón
      Marine 2025.

      • 1
      •  read
    • Validation Study of Roughness Effect on Full-scale CFD Prediction of a Self-propelled Tanker for Straight Run and Zigzag Maneuvering

      M. Hossain*, H. Hatakenaka, D. Arai, K. Tajima, K. Koike, K. Kimu
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Blind Resistance Prediction Using CFD - A Summary of the Lucy Ashton Workshop

      R. Lopes*, A. Eslamdoost, R. Bensow, D. Ponkratov
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • Scale effect analysis on calm water resistance using model basin testing conditions and CFD

      S. Cunningham*, J. Green
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Verification and validation of the JoRes1 Tanker in model and full scale

      A. Shiri*, K. Korkmaz
      Marine 2025.

      • 8
      •  read
    • Improving full-scale CFD predictions through hull and propeller roughness modelling

      T. Melissaris*
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Gray Area Mitigation by Turbulence Injection for Hybrid RANS/LES Simulation of Complex Flow

      A. Monot*, C. Friess, J. Wackers
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Verification and validation of frictional resistance of flat plates with and without roughness

      K. Korkmaz*, M. Leer-Andersen, K. Kim
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Resistance extrapolation for ships with a wetted transom stern

      B. Starke*, H. Raven, C. Pouw, M. Verhulst
      Marine 2025.

      • 1
      •  read
    • How to use JoRes ship scale open data for CFD validation?

      D. Ponkratov*, M. Wheeler, T. Maniyan Annamalai
      Marine 2025.

      • 3
      •  read
    • Impacts of Fin Stabilizers on The Powering, Motions and Loading of Atlantic Canadian Fishing Vessels

      M. Islam*, F. Jahra, R. Young, T. Hall, K. Brett
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Design and Optimization of a Duct for Enhanced Ducted Propeller Open-Water Performance

      N. Donyavizadeh, A. Eslamdoost*, R. Bensow
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • Predicting airfoil pressure distributions using boundary graph neural networks

      S. Jena, G. Weymouth*, A. Lidtke, A. Coraddu
      Marine 2025.

      • 8
      •  read
    • Decoupled Hull Resistance Prediction: A Computationally Aware and Physically Plausible approach for Data-Driven Surrogates

      J. Walker*, A. Coraddu, L. Oneto
      Marine 2025.

      • 8
      •  read
    • Advances in Actuator based methods for modelling energy extraction

      R. Willden*
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Actuator Line Simulations of a Foiling Boat

      D. Lalanza McCullough*, D. Soban, P. Schmitt
      Marine 2025.

      • 1
      •  read
    • A coupled Immersed Boundary Method and Actuator Surface Method for Wind Turbine Simulation

      B. Thornber*, S. Chu, J. Park, R. Cockroft
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Effectiveness of the actuator line method in capturing unsteady gust interactions with tidal rotors

      M. Zormpa, A. Smyth*, C. Vogel, F. Zilic de Arcos
      Marine 2025.

      • 8
      •  read
    • Unsteady blade loading behaviour of a benchmark tidal turbine in regular wave and current

      X. Chen*, F. Zilic de Arcos, G. Pinon, R. Willden
      Marine 2025.

      • 10
      •  read
    • Crossflow Turbine Wakes and Simulation Speed-up Using Wake Initialisation

      J. Johnston*, M. Zormpa, P. Schmitt
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • On the Merits of a Lifting Line Model for Simulating Hydrofoil Hydrodynamics

      L. Chernyshev*, N. Kabaliuk, M. Jermy
      Marine 2025.

      • 1
      •  read
    • Actuator Line Simulations of a Field Scale Cross Flow Tidal Turbine

      P. Schmitt*, J. Johnston, M. Zormpa, C. Frost, P. Cronin, J. McEn
      Marine 2025.

      • 4
      •  read
    • Numerical modelling of cross-flow turbines: 2D blade-resolved against 2D actuator line method simulations

      M. Zormpa*, J. Johnston, C. Vogel, P. Schmitt
      Marine 2025.

      • 6
      •  read
    • Development and Validation of an Actuator Line Method for Floating Turbines

      D. Green*, M. Zormpa, C. Vogel
      Marine 2025.

      • 14
      •  read
    • Comparing actuator line and disc models for the hydrodynamic design of tidal stream turbine rotors

      H. Edwards*, X. Chen, C. Vogel, R. Willden
      Marine 2025.

      • 1
      •  read
    • Analysis of Wind Turbine Wake Meandering Using the Actuator Disc Model

      A. Adam*, C. Vogel, A. Smyth
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Predicting the Hydrodynamic Performance of Inland Waterway Ships in Extreme Shallow Waters Using State-of-the-Art CFD

      L. Zentari*, B. Ould el Moctar
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Ship Entry to Locks

      P. Mucha*
      Marine 2025.

      • 1
      •  read
    • Detailed Numerical Modelling of Inland Navigation's Impact on Sediment Suspension

      S. Kaidi*, H. Smaoui, D. Pham Van Bang
      Marine 2025.

      • 8
      •  read
    • Numerical simulation of naval hydrodynamics by the LBM-IBM coupling

      H. Smaoui, S. Kaidi*
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Cavitation prediction in high performance sailing, one year later.

      D. de Prémorel*, P. Robin, A. Leroyer, J. Wackers
      Marine 2025.

      • 0
      •  read
    • Experimental Investigation of two Typical Hydrofoil Sections with Cavitation

      P. Bot*, P. François, F. Hauville, S. Soton, J. Astolfi
      Marine 2025.

      • 6
      •  read
    • Computational Fluid Dynamics as a performance aid tool in rowing: utopia or reality

      A. Leroyer*
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Experimental investigation of IQFoil Lift and Drag in a towing tank

      J. Cook*, J. Banks
      Marine 2025.

      • 6
      •  read
    • High Efficiency Swimming using Hydrodynamic Eigenmode Decomposition

      J. Preuveneers*, A. Smyth, L. Di Mare
      Marine 2025.

      • 0
      •  read
    • NACRA17 real time dynamic simulation

      H. Roche*, P. Kerdraon
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Experimental study of ventilation inception on Olympic serie Kitefoil shaft

      B. Augier*, M. Hochhausen, P. Iachkine, M. Fermigier, C. Clanet
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Geometric Awareness in High-Order Numerical Modelling of Hydrofoils

      L. Cattarossi*, A. Mola
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Time-Dependent Forces on an Accelerating Flat Plate

      N. Copsey, J. Banks*, M. Kurt
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Comparative Study of Aerodynamic Load Modeling Techniques for Aeroelastic Analysis of Hard Wingsails

      M. Mebratu*, W. De Waele, K. Hectors
      Marine 2025.

      • 2
      •  read
    • Previous
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
    • Next

    Terms of use    Ethics    Privacy policy    Sitemaps    FAQs    Help    About us

    © 2025 Scipedia, S.L.