This paper presents an experimental campaign carried out in an historical industrial building of Barcelona from the 19th century, considering in-situ and laboratory minor destructive testing (MDT) techniques. The results obtained showed a good relationship between the in-situ MDT techniques and the tests carried out in the laboratory. The experimental results from different portions of the large-scale building allowed the discovery of different material typologies deriving from different construction phases.

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document


[1] A. W. Hendry, Structural Masonry. London: Macmillan Education UK, (1998).

[2] L. Pelà, P. Roca, and A. Aprile, “Combined In-Situ and Laboratory Minor Destructive Testing of Historical Mortars,” Int. J. Archit. Herit., vol. 12, no. 3, (2018), pp. 334–349.

[3] European Committee for Standardization (CEN), “EN 1015-12 Methods of test for mortar for masonry - Part 12: Determination of adhesive strength of hardened rendering and plastering mortars on substrates.” (2016).

[4] European Committee for Standardization (CEN), “EN 772-1+A1 Methods of test for Masonry Units - Part 1: Determination of Compressive Strength.” (2016).

[5] Deutsche Norm, “DIN 18555-9 Testing of mortar containing mineral binders - Part 9: Determining the compressive strength of hardened mortar.” (1999).

[6] L. Pelà, E. Canella, A. Aprile, and P. Roca, “Compression test of masonry core samples extracted from existing brickwork,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 119, (2016), pp. 230–240.

[7] J. Segura, L. Pelà, P. Roca, and A. Cabané, “Experimental analysis of the size effect on the compressive behaviour of cylindrical samples core-drilled from existing brick masonry,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 228, (2019), p. 116759.

[8] R. C. de Vekey and M. Sassu, “Comparison of non-destructive in-situ mechanical test on masonry mortars: The PNT-G method and the helix method,” in Proceedings of the 11th international brick and block masonry conference (IB2MC), (1997), pp. 376–384.

[9] M. L. Tavares, M. R. Veiga, and A. Fragata, “Grouting mortars for consolidation of historical renders showing loss of adhesion,” in 2nd Conference on Historic Mortars - HMC 2010 and RILEM TC 203-RHM final workshop, (2010), pp. 743–752.

[10] American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), “C67-18 Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Brick and Structural Clay Tile.” (2005).

[11] UIC, “Leaflet 778-3R: Recommendations for the inspection, assessment and maintainance of masonry arch bridges.” UIC – International Union of Railways, Paris, France, (1995).

[12] European Committee for Standardization (CEN), “EN 1996-1-1 Design of masonry structures -Part 1-1: General rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry structures.” (2005).

[13] L. Pelà, S. Saloustros, and P. Roca, “Cylindrical samples of brick masonry with aerial lime mortar under compression: Experimental and numerical study,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 227, no. September, (2019), p. 116782.

[14] A. Benedetti and M. Tarozzi, “Interpretation formulas for in situ characterization of mortar strength,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 242, (2020), p. 118093.

[15] W. A. Ferguson and J. Skandamoorthy, “The screw pull-out test for the in-situ measurement of the strength of masonry materials,” in Proceedings of the 10th international brick and block masonry conference, (1994), pp. 1257–66.

[16] Masonry Standards Joint Committee (MSJC), “Specification for Masonry Structures (ACI 530.1-05/ASCE 6-05/TMS 602-05).” (2004).

[17] European Committee for Standardization (CEN), “EN 1052-1 Methods of test for masonry - Part 1 : Determination of compressive strength.” (1999).

[18] J. Segura, L. Pelà, and P. Roca, “Monotonic and cyclic testing of clay brick and lime mortar masonry in compression,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 193, (2018), pp. 453–466.

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 30/11/21
Submitted on 30/11/21

Volume Inspection methods, non-destructive techniques and laboratory testing, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.144
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score


Views 7
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?