Abstract

The present paper discusses seismic behaviour of multi-tier pagoda temple. The seismic behaviour was examined by different pushover analysis techniques including adaptive pushover analysis. The case study objective is a five-tier pagoda. The studied pagoda is built of timber frameworks and masonry walls. Masonry is composed of burnt solid bricks and earthen mortar. The pushover analyses are conducted, taking into account frictional behaviour between timber and masonry. The research challenges two tasks. A first task deals with experiments on interface behaviour between timber and masonry in earthen mortar. The study of the discussed interface behaviour is not straightforward since few tests have been conducted on similar subjects. In the present study, direct shear tests are performed. A second task coves pushover analyses of the five-tier pagoda by means of FE analysis. The paper provides useful experimental data of interface behaviour between timber and masonry in earthen mortar and also suggests efficient strategies of seismic assessment of pagoda-type structures.

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document

References

[1] Pelà, L., Alessandra A. and Benedetti, A. "Seismic assessment of masonry arch bridges." Engineering Structures 31, no. 8 (2009): 1777-1788.

[2] Lagomarsino, S. and Cattari, S. "Seismic performance of historical masonry structures through pushover and nonlinear dynamic analyses." In Perspectives on European earthquake engineering and seismology. Springer, Cham (2015): 265-292.

[3] Facchini, L., Betti M., Corazzi, R. and Vladimir, C.K. "Nonlinear seismic behavior of historical masonry towers by means of different numerical models." Procedia engineering 199 (2017): 601-606.

[4] Ferraioli, M., Miccoil L., Donato, A.D. and Mandara, A. "Dynamic characterisation and seismic assessment of medieval masonry towers." Natural Hazards 86, no.2 (2017): 489- 515.

[5] Endo, Y., Pelà, L. and Roca, P. "Review of different pushover analysis methods applied to masonry buildings and comparison with nonlinear dynamic analysis." Journal of Earthquake Engineering 21, no.8 (2017): 1234-1255.

[6] Moreira, S., Ramos, L.F., Oliveira, D.V., and Lourenço, P.B. "Experimental behavior of masonry wall-to-timber elements connections strengthened with injection anchors." Engineering structures 81 (2014): 98-109.

[7] Vieux-Champagne, F., Sieffert, Y., Grange, S., Polastri, A., Ceccotti, A. and Daudeville, L. "Experimental analysis of seismic resistance of timber- framed structures with stones and earth infill." Engineering Structures 69 (2014): 102-115.

[8] Antoniou, S. and Pinho, R. "Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure." Journal of earthquake engineering 8, no. 05 (2004): 643- 661.

[9] Shrestha, D.B. and Singh, C.E. "The History of Ancient and Medieval Nepal in a Nutshell" With Some Comparative Traces of Foreign History. Vol. 1. (1972).

[10] Center for Applied Research and Development (CARD) Measured drawing of Kumbeshwar temple. Institute of Engineering, Pulchowk Lalitpur (2009).

[11] Endo, Y. and Hanazato, T. "Seismic Behaviour of a Historic Five-Tiered Pagoda in Nepal." In Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions. Springer, Cham, (2019): 1337-1345.

[12] European Committee of Standardization (CEN), EN772-1, Methods of Test for Masonry Units–Part 1: Determination of Compressive Strength, CEN, Brussels, 2011.

[13] Shimadzu Corporation. “Autograph AGS-X Series” Shimadzu Corporation (2015).

[14] Japan geotechnical society (JGS) Basics and guides to soil tests. Japan geotechnical society: Tokyo, (2002), (Japanese).

[15] Department of Urban Development and Building Construction (DUDBC), Nepal National Building code (NBC) 203:1994 Guidelines for Earthquake Resistant Building Construction: Low Strength Masonry, Department of Urban Development and Building Construction, Kathmandu, (1994).

[16] CEN, EN 1015-11. Methods of test for mortar for masonry–Part 11: Determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened mortar. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels. (1999).

[17] Avrami, E., Hubert, G. and Hardy, M. "Terra literature review." An overview of research in earthen architecture conservation: Los Angeles, The Getty Conservation Institute (2008).

[18] Japanese Industry Standard (JIS), Z 2101, Method of test for woods, Tokyo, (2009), (Japanese).

[19] CEN, EN 1052-3, Methods of test for masonry-Part 3: Determination of initial shear strength. Brussels. (2002).

[20] Department of Urban Development and Building Construction, Nepal National Building code. NBC 112:1994 Timber. Department of Urban Development and Building Construction, Kathmandu, (1994).

[21] Endo, Y., Yamaguchi, K., Hanazato, T. and Mishra, C. "Characterisation of mechanical behaviour of masonry composed of fired bricks and earthen mortar." Engineering Failure Analysis (2019): 104280.

[22] CEN, Eurocode 6: Design of masonry structures–Part 1-1: General rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry structures. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels. (2005).

[23] Kaushik, H.B., Durgesh, C.R. and Sudhir, K.J. "Stress-strain characteristics of clay brick masonry under uniaxial compression." Journal of materials in Civil Engineering 19, no. 9 (2007): 728-739.

[24] TNO Diana, Finite element analysis user’s manual-release 10.2’. (2017).

Back to Top
GET PDF

Document information

Published on 29/11/21
Submitted on 29/11/21

Volume Numerical modeling and structural analysis, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.020
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?