Progress of thematic repositories and megajournals: Perspectives in 2018

Resumen

Se describe la evolución de diversos repositorios temáticos aparecidos en 2017, así como alguna de las tendencias de futuro que se apuntan. Se discute el momento actual de las megarrevistas, con énfasis en su viabilidad, modelo de negocio y estrategias de consolidación.

Texto completo

Referencias

Binfield, Peter (2014). “Novel scholarly journal concepts”. En: Bartling, Sönke; Friesike, Sascha (ed.). Opening science. The evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing. Springer, pp. 155-163. ISBN: 978 3 319 00026 8 http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8

Björk, Bo-Christer (2018). “Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017”, PeerJ 6: e4357. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4357

Borrego, Ángel (2017), “Institutional repositories versus ResearchGate: The depositing habits of Spanish researchers”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 3, pp. 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1099

Davis, Phil (2017a). “Scientific reports overtakes PLOS One as largest megajournal”. The scholarly kitchen, 6 abril. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/04/06/scientific-reports-overtakes-plos-one-as-largest-megajournal

Davis, Phil (2017b). “PLOS reports $1.7M loss In 2016”. The scholarly kitchen, 27 noviembre. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/11/27/plos-reports-2016-financial-loss

Ellers, Jacintha; Crowther, Thomas W.; Harvey, Jeffrey A. (2017). “Gold open access publishing in mega-journals: Developing countries pay the price of western premium academic output” Journal of scholarly publishing, v. 49, n. 1, pp. 89-102. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.49.1.89

Hathcock, April (2017). “Open access week 2017: Launch of LIS scholarship archive”. At the intersection, 23 octubre. https://aprilhathcock.wordpress.com/2017/10/23/open-access-week-2017-launch-of-lis-scholarship-archive

Lopez-Borrull, Alexandre (2012). “Física vs química: dos modelos de publicación científica”. El profesional de la informacion, v. 21, n. 2, pp. 167-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.mar.07

Lopez-Borrull, Alexandre (2017). “Evolución de repositorios temáticos y megarrevistas: visión 2017”. Anuario ThinkEPI, v. 11, pp. 242-246. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2017.44

Melero, Remedios (2018). “Evolució i nova generació dels repositoris”. Blok de BiD, 28 febrero. http://www.ub.edu/blokdebid/ca/node/850

Shin, Eun-Ja (2017). “Can the growth of mega-journals affect authors’ choice of journal?”. Serials review, v. 43, n. 2, pp. 137-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2017.1313092

Spezi, Valerie; Wakeling, Simon; Pinfield, Stephen; Creaser, Claire; Fry, Jenny; Willet, Peter (2017). “Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review”. Journal of documentation, v. 73, n. 2, pp. 263-283. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2016-0082

Spezi, Valerie; Wakeling, Simon; Pinfield, Stephen; Fry, Jenny; Creaser, Claire; Willet, Peter (2018). “‘Let the community decide?’ The vision and reality of soundness-only peer review in open-access mega-journals”. Journal of documentation, v. 74, n. 1, pp.137-161. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2017-0092

Villatoro, Francisco (2018). “Scientific Reports ya es la mayor megarrevista científica superando a PLoS One”. La ciencia de la mula Francis, 19 febrero. http://francis.naukas.com/2018/02/19/scientific-reports-supera-a-plos-one-en-2017-siendo-la-mayor-megarrevista-cientifica/

Wakeling, Simon; Spezi, Valerie; Fry, Jenny; Creaser, Claire;; Pinfield, Stephen; Willet, Peter (2017a). “Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 1: Motivations)”. Learned publishing, v. 30, pp. 301–311. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1117/epdf

Wakeling, Simon; Spezi, Valerie; Fry, Jenny; Creaser, Claire;; Pinfield, Stephen; Willet, Peter (2017b). “Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 2: Operational realities)”. Learned publishing , v. 30, pp. 313–322. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1118/epdf