Se describe la evolución de diversos repositorios temáticos aparecidos en 2017, así como alguna de las tendencias de futuro que se apuntan. Se discute el momento actual de las megarrevistas, con énfasis en su viabilidad, modelo de negocio y estrategias de consolidación.

Texto completo

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document


Binfield, Peter (2014). “Novel scholarly journal concepts”. En: Bartling, Sönke; Friesike, Sascha (ed.). Opening science. The evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing. Springer, pp. 155-163. ISBN: 978 3 319 00026 8

Björk, Bo-Christer (2018). “Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017”, PeerJ 6: e4357.

Borrego, Ángel (2017), “Institutional repositories versus ResearchGate: The depositing habits of Spanish researchers”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 3, pp. 185–192.

Davis, Phil (2017a). “Scientific reports overtakes PLOS One as largest megajournal”. The scholarly kitchen, 6 abril.

Davis, Phil (2017b). “PLOS reports $1.7M loss In 2016”. The scholarly kitchen, 27 noviembre.

Ellers, Jacintha; Crowther, Thomas W.; Harvey, Jeffrey A. (2017). “Gold open access publishing in mega-journals: Developing countries pay the price of western premium academic output” Journal of scholarly publishing, v. 49, n. 1, pp. 89-102.

Hathcock, April (2017). “Open access week 2017: Launch of LIS scholarship archive”. At the intersection, 23 octubre.

Lopez-Borrull, Alexandre (2012). “Física vs química: dos modelos de publicación científica”. El profesional de la informacion, v. 21, n. 2, pp. 167-172.

Lopez-Borrull, Alexandre (2017). “Evolución de repositorios temáticos y megarrevistas: visión 2017”. Anuario ThinkEPI, v. 11, pp. 242-246.

Melero, Remedios (2018). “Evolució i nova generació dels repositoris”. Blok de BiD, 28 febrero.

Shin, Eun-Ja (2017). “Can the growth of mega-journals affect authors’ choice of journal?”. Serials review, v. 43, n. 2, pp. 137-146.

Spezi, Valerie; Wakeling, Simon; Pinfield, Stephen; Creaser, Claire; Fry, Jenny; Willet, Peter (2017). “Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review”. Journal of documentation, v. 73, n. 2, pp. 263-283.

Spezi, Valerie; Wakeling, Simon; Pinfield, Stephen; Fry, Jenny; Creaser, Claire; Willet, Peter (2018). “‘Let the community decide?’ The vision and reality of soundness-only peer review in open-access mega-journals”. Journal of documentation, v. 74, n. 1, pp.137-161.

Villatoro, Francisco (2018). “Scientific Reports ya es la mayor megarrevista científica superando a PLoS One”. La ciencia de la mula Francis, 19 febrero.

Wakeling, Simon; Spezi, Valerie; Fry, Jenny; Creaser, Claire;; Pinfield, Stephen; Willet, Peter (2017a). “Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 1: Motivations)”. Learned publishing, v. 30, pp. 301–311.

Wakeling, Simon; Spezi, Valerie; Fry, Jenny; Creaser, Claire;; Pinfield, Stephen; Willet, Peter (2017b). “Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 2: Operational realities)”. Learned publishing , v. 30, pp. 313–322.

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 25/04/18
Submitted on 25/04/18

Volume 12, 2018
DOI: 10.3145/thinkepi.2018.47
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score


Views 4
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?