Summary

Additive manufacturing (AM) is considered as a key technology for the efficient production of individualized components. The technique enables the tool-less production of complex geometries and designs that could not be realized cost-effectively with conventional manufacturing methods. The focus of this work is on the Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), where a thermoplastic filament is extruded trough a nozzle. The material is deposited layer by layer until the final part is build. Thereby, high temperature gradients occur within the part when the hot material is deposited on the lower layers. During the printing process the lower layers are reheated several times so that the material properties are influenced even after the deposition has been made. The thermal history has major effects on crucial material properties such as the degree of crystallization or thermal and mechanical properties. An inadequate degree of crystallization influences both the structural properties such as the stiffness or the degree of bonding and the dimensional accuracy due to subsequent shrinkage effects. Additionally, the temperature gradients cause residual stresses which are partly relaxed to varying part deformations. The remaining stresses can lead to premature failures. To achieve a high and repeatable part quality as well as a low scatter in the final part dimension an in-depth process understanding is required considering the underlying material-process-partinteractions. In order to analyse these complex multiphysical processes, manufacturing process simulations are a suitable method. A main requirement for the numerical analysis of AM processes is the calculation of the thermal history as accurately as possible. The objective of this work is, therefore, to evaluate the prediction accuracy of currently available AM process simulation tools. For this purpose, a gcode-based AM process simulation of a cuboid is performed in order to calculate the transient temperature fields using the Abaqus AM plug-in from Dassault Syst`emes. The cuboid made of PETG is printed with a Prusa i3 MK3.

Abstract

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document

Full Paper

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document
Back to Top
GET PDF

Document information

Published on 24/11/22
Accepted on 24/11/22
Submitted on 24/11/22

Volume Computational Solid Mechanics, 2022
DOI: 10.23967/eccomas.2022.288
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 2
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?