The work is focused on the structural vulnerability assessment of two historical constructions, chosen as case-studies representative of a recurrent typology of Italian rationalist architecture, dating back to the Fascist period, often hosting public offices. Both examined buildings have similar dimensions and geometry, being characterised by five/six storeys and by an almost square plan with an inner courtyard, and are located in EmiliaRomagna, in zones of medium seismic hazard. The older building, dating back to the Thirties and located in Ravenna, has a mixed masonry-reinforced concrete structure, while the other one, built in the late forties and located in Parma, is characterised by an unreinforced masonry structure with some limited reinforced concrete elements. For the vulnerability assessment of the two buildings, a multi-disciplinary approach was followed, including the historical documents search concerning both the investigated buildings and the surrounding areas, the detailed geometrical and structural survey, the identification of materials, and in situ and laboratory tests to evaluate materials mechanical properties. These activities allowed reaching an adequate level of knowledge about the present conditions of the structures and their critical deficiencies. This knowledge path is not only necessary for the subsequent numerical analyses, but is also important as it allows targeting the repairing interventions, possibly reducing their final costs, in agreement with the “minimum intervention” approach for heritage buildings.

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document


[1] Codice dei Beni Culturali, D.L. n.42, 22/91/2004. In G.U.R.I. n.45, 24/2/2004 (in Italian).

[2] Brandi, C., Theory of restoration. Translation by Cynthia Rockwell. Florence: Nardini.

[3] Giuffrè, A., Carocci, C., Statica e dinamica delle costruzioni murarie storiche. In: Proc. CNR Int Congress “Le pietre da costruzione: il tufo calcareo e la pietra leccese”, Mario Adda Editore, Bari, (1993): 539-598 (in Italian).

[4] Ceroni, F., Pecce, M., Sica, S. and Garofano, A. Assessment of seismic vulnerability of a historical masonry building. Buildings (2012) 2: 332–358.

[5] Lagomarsino, S., Cattari, S., Degli Abbati, S. and Ottonelli, D. Seismic assessment of complex monumental buildings in aggregate: the case study of Palazzo del Podestà in Mantua (Italy). In: F. Peña et al. (Eds.): SAHC2014—9th international conference on structural analysis of historical constructions, Mexico City, Mexico (2014).

[6] Caprili, S. and Puncello, I. Knowledge-Based Approach for the Structural Assessment of Monumental Buildings: Application to Case Studies. Front. Built Env. (2019) 5: 52.

[7] Boschi, S., Borghini, A., Pintucchi, B. and Zani, N. Seismic vulnerability of historic masonry buildings: A case study in the center of Lucca. Procedia Struct. Integr. (2018) 11: 169–176.

[8] Circolare n. 617. Instructions for the application of "Nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni di cui al D.M. 14 gennaio 2008", (in Italian), 2009.

[9] NTC 2008. Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni, D. M. 14/01/2008. In G.U.R.I., 29, 04/02/2008 (in Italian).

[10]UNI EN 1998-3. Eurocode 8. Design of structures for Earthquake resistance – Part 3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings (2005).

[12] Penna, A., Lagomarsino, S. and Galasco, A. A nonlinear macro-element model for the seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn (2014) 43(2):159–179.

[13] Bracchi, S., Rota, M., Penna, A. and Magenes, G. Consideration of modelling uncertainties in the seismic assessment of masonry buildings by equivalent-frame approach. Bull Earthquake Eng (2015) 13: 3423-3448.

[14] Ceroni, F., Pecce, M., Manfredi, G. Modelling and seismic assessment of the bell Tower of Santa Maria del Carmine: Problems and solutions. J. Earthq. Eng. (2010) 14: 30–56.

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 30/11/21
Submitted on 30/11/21

Volume Interdisciplinary projects and case studies, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.317
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score


Views 13
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?