Investigating the Gender Gap in Agricultural Productivity: Evidence from Uganda

Abstract

Women comprise 50 percent of the agricultural labor force in Sub-Saharan Africa, but manage plots that are reportedly on average 20 to 30 percent less productive. As a source of income inequality and aggregate productivity loss, the country-specific magnitude and drivers of this gender gap are of great interest. Using national data from the Uganda National Panel Survey for 2009/10 and 2010/11, the gap before controlling for endowments was estimated to be 17.5 percent. Panel data methods were combined with an Oaxaca decomposition to investigate the gender differences in resource endowment and return to endowment driving this gap. Although men have greater access to inputs, input use is so low and inverse returns to plot size so strong in Uganda that smaller female-managed plots have a net endowment advantage of 12 percent, revealing a larger unexplained gap of 29.5 percent. Two-fifths of this unexplained gap is attributed to differential returns to the child dependency ratio and one-fifth to differential returns to transport access, implying that greater child care responsibilities and difficulty accessing input and output markets from areas without transport are the largest drivers of the gap. Smaller and less robust drivers include differential uptake of cash crops, and differential uptake and return to improved seeds and pesticides.

Document type: Book

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

• http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7262

• http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21994 under the license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/

• http://hdl.handle.net/10986/25367 under the license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/

• http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2015/05/11/090224b082e68823/1_0/Rendered/PDF/Investigating00evidence0from0Uganda.pdf

• https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/10986/25367/1/j.worlddev.2016.06.006.pdf under the license cc-by-nc-nd

• https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/10986/25367/1/j.worlddev.2016.06.006.pdf under the license cc-by-nc-nd

DOIS: 10.1596/1813-9450-7262 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.06.006