|
|
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − |
| |
| | | | |
| | <div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"> | | <div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"> |
| Line 7: |
Line 6: |
| | <big>'''Engineering, production and life-cycle management for the complete construction of large-length FIBRE-based SHIPs'''</big></div> | | <big>'''Engineering, production and life-cycle management for the complete construction of large-length FIBRE-based SHIPs'''</big></div> |
| | | | |
| − | <big>'''D8.2 (WP8): '''Cost-benefit analysis stakeholder report</big>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''Responsible Partner''': ATEKNEA
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''Contributor(s)''': TSI, CIMNE, COMPASSIS, LLOYDS, BV, TWI, IXBLUE, TUCO, DANAOS, SOERMAR, FOINIKAS, ANEK
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {| style="width: 100%;border-collapse: collapse;"
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | colspan='3' style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|Dissemination Level
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">PU</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Public</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">PP</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Restricted to other program participants (including the Commission Services)</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">RE</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services)</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">CO</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services)</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">x</span>
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
| |
| − | <big>'''<br/>'''</big></div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Document Information Table==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {| style="width: 100%;border-collapse: collapse;"
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Contract number:</span>
| |
| − | | colspan='5' style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">723360</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Project acronym:</span>
| |
| − | | colspan='5' style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">FIBRESHIP </span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Project Coordinator:</span>
| |
| − | | colspan='5' style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">TSI</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Document Responsible Partner:</span>
| |
| − | | colspan='3' style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">ATEKNEA SOLUTIONS EUROPE</span>
| |
| − | | colspan='2' style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">ATEKNEA</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Deliverable Type:</span>
| |
| − | | colspan='5' style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Report</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Document Title:</span>
| |
| − | | colspan='5' style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Cost-benefit analysis stakeholder report</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Document ID:</span>
| |
| − | | colspan='2' style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">D8.2</span>
| |
| − | | colspan='3' style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Version: 5</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Contractual Date of Delivery:</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">31/05/2020</span>
| |
| − | | colspan='3' style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Actual Date of Delivery:</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">03/06/2020</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Filename:</span>
| |
| − | | colspan='5' style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">D8.2_Cost-benefit analysis stakeholder report</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Status:</span>
| |
| − | | colspan='5' style="border: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Final document</span>
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Authoring & Approval==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {| style="width: 100%;border-collapse: collapse;"
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | colspan='5' style="border-left: 1pt solid black;border-bottom: 1pt solid black;border-right: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">PREPARED BY</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Author</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Date</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Modified Page/Sections</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Version</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Comments</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">ATEKNEA</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">20/05/2020</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">ALL</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">V1</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Creation of the document</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">ATEKNEA</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">28/05/2020</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Minor Modifications</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">V2</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Revision of the document</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">TSI</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">02/05/2020</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Slight modifications all over the document</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">V3</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">General review</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">ATEKNEA</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">02/05/2020</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Slight modifications all over the document</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">V4</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Final Review</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">TSI</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">03/06/2020</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">NA</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">V5</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Small Modifications. Document approval</span>
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {| style="width: 100%;border-collapse: collapse;"
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | colspan='5' style="border-left: 1pt solid black;border-bottom: 1pt solid black;border-right: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: bottom;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">APPROVED BY</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Name</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Role</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Partner</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Date</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Document Manager</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Attila Uderszky</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Task Leader</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">ATEKNEA</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">03/06/2020</span>
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Document Approval</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Alfonso Jurado</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Project Coordinator</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">TSI</span>
| |
| − | | style="border: 1pt solid black;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">03/06/2020</span>
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==<br/>EXECUTIVE SUMMARY==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The objective of the present report D8.2 in relation with Task 8.3 in Work Package 8 was to provide cost benefit analysis support to FiBRESHiP partners throughout to entire project in the technical work packages related to the analysis of large-length fibre-based commercial vessels (FRP) such as the three types targeted in the project: container ship, Ro-Pax, and Fishing Research Vessel (FRV) and to benchmark them with conventional steel (BAU) vessels. Technical decision support with cost-benefit analysis included production, operation and dismantling of the above mentioned vessels of the same size by using NPV, RRI and ROI calculations, with the reflection of operational costs in fuel saving due to weight reduction. The deliverable reflects to the needs of industry stakeholders by revealing cost-benefit information and concludes with the financial comparison between conventional (steel) and FRP vessels.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==TABLEOF CONTENTS==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =1. INTRODUCTION 6=
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =2. OVERVIEW OF THE FIBRESHIP SOLUTION 7=
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 3. METHODOLOGY OF THE COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS 8
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 4. INTRODUCTION TO THE COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS TOOL WITH THE EXAMPLE OF THE THREE VESSELS 10
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 4.1. Dashboard 10
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 4.2. Sum of cost benefit and with revenue estimation 12
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 4.3. Visualisation of infographics and charts inthe Cost Benefit Calculator Tool 12
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 4.4. Operation costs 13
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 4.5. Cash-flow calculation, NPV, IRR and ROI 15
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 4.6. The price of the ship 15
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 4.7. Revenue estimation 16
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 4.8. Revenue from recycling 17
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 4.9. Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) 17
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =5. VESSEL ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON 19=
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =6. CONCLUSIONS 21=
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 7. ANNEX I – SCREENSHOTS OF THE COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS TOOL 22
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==LIST OF FIGURES==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 1 – Financial indicators for BAU and FRP vessel types (container, RoPax, FRV) 9
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 2 – Financial parameters to be set in Dashboard 10
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 3 – Design parameters to be set in Dashboard 11
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 4– Scrapping and recycling parameters to be set in Dashboard 12
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 5 – Costs and benefits summary table in the tool 12
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 6 – Visualisation of ship operating hours per months 13
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 7 – Visualisation of main engine load profile 13
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 8 – Visualisation of various operation costs 15
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 9 – Visualisation of NPV, IRR and ROI 15
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 10 – Setting up the estimation of the ship price 16
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 11 – Revenue estimation for FRP and BAU container ships 16
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 12 – Revenue estimation for FRP and BAU RoPax ships 17
| |
| | | | |
| − | Figure 13 – Revenue estimation for FRP and BAU fishing research vessels 17
| + | == SUMMARY== |
| | | | |
| − | Figure 14 – Recycling revenue for FiBRESHIP with scrapping materials 17
| + | This document is related to the report D8.2 of the workpackage 8 of the Fibreship project. The main goal of this workpackage was to provide cost benefit analysis support throughout to entire project in the technical work packages related to the analysis of large-length fibre-based commercial vessels (FRP) such as the three types targeted in the project: container ship, Ro-Pax, and Fishing Research Vessel (FRV) and to benchmark them with conventional steel (BAU) vessels. Technical decision support with cost-benefit analysis included production, operation and dismantling of the above mentioned vessels of the same size by using NPV, RRI and ROI calculations, with the reflection of operational costs in fuel saving due to weight reduction. The deliverable reflects to the needs of industry stakeholders by revealing cost-benefit information and concludes with the financial comparison between conventional (steel) and FRP vessels. |
| | | | |
| − | Figure 15 – Energy Efficiency Design Index for later FiBRESHiP developments 18
| + | The experience acquired throughout the project has been implemented in different cost-benefit analysis tools for the targeted vessels. These tools can be found below. |
| | | | |
| | + | <!-- |
| | ==NOMENCLATURE/ ACRONYM LIST== | | ==NOMENCLATURE/ ACRONYM LIST== |
| | | | |
| Line 339: |
Line 139: |
| | <span id='_Toc37404352'></span><span id='_Toc42092943'></span> | | <span id='_Toc37404352'></span><span id='_Toc42092943'></span> |
| | | | |
| − | ==1. <br/>INTRODUCTION== | + | ==1. INTRODUCTION== |
| | | | |
| | The implementation of the cost-benefit analysis idea was brought up by the time of the FiBRESHiP proposal preparation when it was decided to include an additional task in WP8 to provide the necessary background calculations for technical work package and task leaders. Our intention was to give rapid feedbacks with economic calculations about the development of joining techniques, material selection, fire safety and recycling. The reason behind this regime was to keep development costs in bay and make warnings if a specific technology development task in FiBRESHiP would bring the solution to an unattainable market price. | | The implementation of the cost-benefit analysis idea was brought up by the time of the FiBRESHiP proposal preparation when it was decided to include an additional task in WP8 to provide the necessary background calculations for technical work package and task leaders. Our intention was to give rapid feedbacks with economic calculations about the development of joining techniques, material selection, fire safety and recycling. The reason behind this regime was to keep development costs in bay and make warnings if a specific technology development task in FiBRESHiP would bring the solution to an unattainable market price. |
| Line 350: |
Line 150: |
| | | | |
| | <span id='_Toc42092944'></span> | | <span id='_Toc42092944'></span> |
| | + | |
| | | | |
| | ==2. OVERVIEW OF THE FIBRESHIP SOLUTION== | | ==2. OVERVIEW OF THE FIBRESHIP SOLUTION== |
| Line 652: |
Line 453: |
| | | | |
| | <br/> | | <br/> |
| | + | --> |
| | + | |
| | + | ==COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS TOOLS== |
| | + | |
| | + | |
| | + | [[Image:Garcia-Espinosa_2020a_3844_Container Ship Tool.jpg|link=https://www.scipedia.com/wd/images/5/51/Garcia-Espinosa_2020a_6123_D8.2_FIBRESHIP_Cost_Benefit_Analysis_Container_Ship-BAU_FRP_final.xlsx|D8.2 Cost Benefit Analysis Tool of the Container Ship]] |
| | + | |
| | + | |
| | + | [[Image:Garcia-Espinosa_2020a_2434_BAU.jpg|link=https://www.scipedia.com/wd/images/a/a7/Garcia-Espinosa_2020a_8819_D8.2_FIBRESHIP_Cost_Benefit_Analysis_FRV-BAU_FRP_final.xlsx|D8.2 Cost Benefit Analysis Tool of the Fishing Research Vessel]] |
| | + | |
| | | | |
| − | ==ANNEX I – SCREENSHOTS OF THE COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS TOOL== | + | [[Image:Garcia-Espinosa_2020a_9240_RoPax.jpg|link=https://www.scipedia.com/wd/images/e/e1/Garcia-Espinosa_2020a_4050_D8.2_FIBRESHIP_Cost_Benefit_Analysis_RoPax-BAU_FRP_final.xlsx|D8.2 Cost Benefit Analysis Tool of the RoPax Vessel]] |
This document is related to the report D8.2 of the workpackage 8 of the Fibreship project. The main goal of this workpackage was to provide cost benefit analysis support throughout to entire project in the technical work packages related to the analysis of large-length fibre-based commercial vessels (FRP) such as the three types targeted in the project: container ship, Ro-Pax, and Fishing Research Vessel (FRV) and to benchmark them with conventional steel (BAU) vessels. Technical decision support with cost-benefit analysis included production, operation and dismantling of the above mentioned vessels of the same size by using NPV, RRI and ROI calculations, with the reflection of operational costs in fuel saving due to weight reduction. The deliverable reflects to the needs of industry stakeholders by revealing cost-benefit information and concludes with the financial comparison between conventional (steel) and FRP vessels.
The experience acquired throughout the project has been implemented in different cost-benefit analysis tools for the targeted vessels. These tools can be found below.
