(Created page with "== Abstract == <p>Tal y como sucedió con el <em>Informe </em>Stern que supuso un importante cambio de actitud de la comunidad internacional respecto al cambio clim&aac...") |
Danielquer (talk | contribs) m (Danielquer moved page Review Álvarez 2017a to Álvarez 2017a) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Abstract == | == Abstract == | ||
| − | <p> | + | <p>As it happened with <em>Stern Report</em>, which made international community change their attitude related to climate change, TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity) was a turning point in valuing biodiversity and ecosystem services. This change of attitude happened, partially, thanks to include monetary ecosystem valuation of ecosystem services and how much their conservation and avoid their loss worth to the entire society.</p> |
| − | <p> | + | <p>Integrate monetary valuation in green infrastructure management become shortly in a need to cover societal demands. Thanks to new tools like the Natural Capital Protocol, this exercise could be delivered in a harmonise way.</p> |
Latest revision as of 13:41, 5 December 2017
Abstract
As it happened with Stern Report, which made international community change their attitude related to climate change, TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity) was a turning point in valuing biodiversity and ecosystem services. This change of attitude happened, partially, thanks to include monetary ecosystem valuation of ecosystem services and how much their conservation and avoid their loss worth to the entire society.
Integrate monetary valuation in green infrastructure management become shortly in a need to cover societal demands. Thanks to new tools like the Natural Capital Protocol, this exercise could be delivered in a harmonise way.
Document information
Published on 05/12/17
Submitted on 31/10/17
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
