Latest revision as of 12:24, 8 April 2019

Resumen

Este estudio se centra en las publicaciones de las universidades españolas en la Web of Science (WoS) durante 2014-2016 (125.824 artículos) y calcula 17 indicadores con Altmetric.com. Se han establecido tres objetivos: 1) ofrecer una perspectiva general de las altmétricas en las universidades españolas, 2) determinar la cobertura de Altmetric.com en el caso español y 3) establecer cuáles son las altmétricas más relevantes. Los resultados evidencian que el 42% de los artículos en la WoS están indexados en Altmetric.com. Los indicadores generados por Twitter, prensa digital, Facebook y Wikipedia explican el 82% de la varianza. Como conclusiones se señalan que: a) publicar en revistas de alto impacto y en áreas como Medicina y Biología contribuye a que las universidades obtengan mejores altmétricas; y b) un reducido número de indicadores es suficiente para determinar el impacto altmétrico.  

Pulsa aquí para acceder a la version PDF

Referencias

Altmetric.com (2017a). “How is the Altmetric Attention Score calculated?”. Altmetric support. https://goo.gl/4hvTPp

Altmetric.com (2017b). “Top 100 articles 2017”. Altmetric.com. https://www.altmetric.com/top100/2017/#list

Bar-Ilan, Judit (2008). “Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century – A review”. Journal of informetrics, v. 2, n. 1, pp. 1-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.11.001

Bornmann, Lutz (2014). “Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics”. Journal of informetrics, v. 8, n. 4, pp. 895-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005

Costas, Rodrigo; Zahedi, Zohreh; Wouters, Paul (2015). “Do ‘altmetrics’ correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 10, pp. 2003-2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23309

Gorraiz, Juan; Melero-Fuentes, David; Gumpenberger, Christian; Valderrama-Zurián, Juan-Carlos (2016). “Availability of digital object identifiers (DOIs) in Web of Science and Scopus”. Journal of informetrics, v. 10, n. 1, pp. 98-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.11.008

Gray, Virginia (2017). Principal component analysis: Methods, applications & technology. Nova Science Publishers Inc., Mathematics Research Development. ISBN: 978 1536108897

Gumpenberger, Christian; Glänzel, Wolfgang; Gorraiz, Juan (2016). “The ecstasy and the agony of the Altmetric score”. Scientometrics, v. 108, n. 2, pp. 977-982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1991-5

Hammarfelt, Björn (2014). “Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities”. Scientometrics, v. 101, n. 2, pp. 1419-1430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1261-3

Haustein, Stefanie (2016). “Grand challenges in altmetrics: Heterogeneity, data quality and dependencies”. Scientometrics, v. 108, n. 1, pp. 413-423. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1910-9

Haustein, Stefanie; Bowman, Timothy D.; Costas, Rodrigo (2015). “Interpreting ‘altmetrics’: viewing acts on social media through the lens of citation and social theories”. In: Sugimoto, Cassidy R. (ed.). Theories of informetrics: A festschrift in honor of Blaise Cronin. http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.05701

Haustein, Stefanie; Peters, Isabella; Bar-Ilan, Judit; Priem, Jason; Shema, Hadas; Terliesner, Jens (2014a). “Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community”. Scientometrics, v. 101, n. 2, pp. 1145-1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1221-3

Haustein, Stefanie; Peters, Isabella; Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Thelwall, Mike; Larivière, Vincent (2014b). “Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 65, n. 4, pp. 656-669. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23101

Hicks, Diana; Wouters, Paul; Waltman, Ludo; De-Rijcke, Sarah; Ràfols, Ismael (2015). “The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics”. Nature, v. 520, n. 7548, pp. 429-431 https://www.nature.com/news/bibliometrics-the-leiden-manifesto-for-research-metrics-1.17351

Liu, Jean; Adie, Euan (2013). “Five challenges in altmetrics: A toolmaker’s perspective”. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 39, n. 4, pp. 31-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2013.1720390410

Martín-Martín, Alberto; Orduña-Malea, Enrique; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio (2016). “The role of ego in academic profile services: Comparing Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Mendeley, and ResearcherID”. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2745892

Mohammadi, Ehsan; Thelwall, Mike (2014). “Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 65, n. 8, pp. 1627-1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23071

Peters, Isabella; Kraker, Peter; Lex, Elisabeth; Gumpenberger, Christian; Gorraiz, Juan (2016). “Research data explored: An extended analysis of citations and altmetrics”. Scientometrics, v. 107, n. 2, pp. 723-744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1887-4

Piwowar, Heather (2013a). “Altmetrics: Value all research products”. Nature, v. 493, n. 7431, pp. 159-159. https://doi.org/10.1038/493159a

Piwowar, Heather (2013b). “Introduction altmetrics: what, why and where?”. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 39, n. 4, pp. 8-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2013.1720390404

Priem, Jason; Hemminger, Bradley M. (2010). “Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social web. First Monday, v. 15, n. 7. http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2874/2570

Priem, Jason; Piwowar, Heather A.; Hemminger, Bradley M. (2012). “Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact”. http://arxiv.org/html/1203.4745

Priem, Jason; Taraborelli, Dario; Groth, Paul; Neylon, Cameron (2010). “Altmetrics: A Manifesto”. Altmetrics.org. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto

Robinson-García, Nicolás; Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Zahedi, Zohreh; Costas, Rodrigo (2014). “New data, new possibilities: Exploring the insides of Altmetric.com”. El profesional de la information, v. 23, n. 4, pp. 359-366. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2014.jul.03

Romero-Frías, Esteban; Vaughan, Liwen (2012). “Exploring the relationships between media and political parties through web hyperlink analysis: The case of Spain”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 63, n. 5, pp. 967-976. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22625

Sud, Pardeep; Thelwall, Mike (2014). “Evaluating altmetrics”. Scientometrics, v. 98, n. 2, pp. 1131-1143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1117-2

Thelwall, Mike (2008). “Bibliometrics to webometrics”. Journal of information science, v. 34, n. 4, pp. 605-621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551507087238

Thelwall, Mike; Haustein, Stefanie; Larivière, Vincent; Sugimoto, Cassidy R. (2013). “Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services”. PloS one, v. 8, n. 5, pp. e64841. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064841

Thelwall, Mike; Vaughan, Liwen; Björneborn, Lennart (2005). “Webometrics”. Annual review of information science and technology, v. 39, n. 1, pp. 81-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440390110

Torres-Salinas, Daniel (2017). “Altmetric beauties. ¿Cuáles son los trabajos científicos con mayor impacto en las redes sociales?”. En: I Congreso internacional “Territorios digitales”. Universidad de Granada, Medialab UGR, Granada, 29-30 junio 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10481/47115

Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Cabezas-Clavijo, Álvaro; Jiménez-Contreras, Evaristo (2013). “Altmetrics: nuevos indicadores para la comunicación científica en la Web 2.0”. Comunicar, v. 21, n. 41. https://doi.org/10.3916/C41-2013-05

Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Gumpenberger, Christian; Gorraiz, Juan (2017). “PlumX as a potential tool to assess the macroscopic multidimensional impact of books”. Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, v. 2, n. 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2017.00005

Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Milanés-Guisado, Yusnelkis (2014). “Presencia en redes sociales y altmétricas de los principales autores de la revista ‘El profesional de la información’”. El profesional de la información, v. 23, n. 4, pp. 367-372. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2014.jul.04

Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Robinson-García, Nicolás; Gorraiz, Juan (2017). “Filling the citation gap: Measuring the multidimensional impact of the academic book at institutional level with PlumX”. Scientometrics, v. 113, n. 3, pp. 1371-1384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2539-z

Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Robinson-García, Nicolás; Jiménez-Contreras, Evaristo (2016). “Can we use altmetrics at the institutional level? A case study analysing the coverage by research areas of four Spanish universities”. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.00232

Vaughan, Liwen; Wu, Guozhu (2004). “Links to commercial websites as a source of business information”. Scientometrics, v. 60, n. 3, pp. 487-496. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034389.14825.bc

Weller, Martin (2011). The digital scholar. How technology is transforming scholarly practice. Bloomsbury. ISBN: 978 1 84966 497 4

Wilsdon, James; Allen, Liz; Belfiore, Eleanora; Campbell, Philip; Curry, Stephen; Hill, Steven; Jones, Richard; Kain, Roger; Kerridge Simon; Thelwall, Mike; Tinkler, Jane; Viney, Ian; Wouters, Paul; Hill, Jude; Johnson, Ben (2015). The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. https://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363

Wouters, Paul; Costas, Rodrigo (2012). Users, narcissism and control — tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century. Utrecht: SURF-foundation. http://research-acumen.eu/wp-content/uploads/Users-narcissism-and-control.pdf