This paper presents a review of the state of the art of structural health monitoring using three inspection techniques and their application in the proposed methodology for the study of a historic structure located in a high seismic hazard area. The proposed approaches are a) use of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), a reliable platform for data acquisition in photogrammetric inspection and surveillance work due to its simple handling and accessibility to human risk zones; b) Global Positioning System (GPS), which offers the capability of static or dynamic monitoring, using kinetic navigation (RTK), precise point positioning (PPP) or combination of both methods; c) ambient vibration (AV), an accelerometer test that determines the dynamic properties of a structure, of which values indicate the structural safety status. The building to be studied is the “Santa María de la Asunción” Cathedral of Chilpancingo in Mexico, which represents a great historical value because it hosted the First “Anahuac” Congress in 1813. The structure covers an area of 1056 sqm and has a height of 33.31 m. The construction began after 1902 and has been affected by several seismic events. Because of the earthquake of December 2011, cracks occurred in the basements and keystones of the arches of the two bell towers, severe damage to the right tower, and moderate to the left one. In the frontispiece, top of the arches, and in front of the central nave vault also appeared cracks. The reinforcement process is currently complete. The expected results are a matrix of distances among control points in the building, high-resolution ortho-images, and values of the dynamic structural properties. According to the architectural and structural characteristics, location, importance, and use of the structure, it is proposed to perform a monitoring every six months or after an earthquake with a seismic magnitude greater than six and epicenter less than 60 km. The comparison of the measurement parameters will indicate the structural health of the building.

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document


[1] K. Worden and J. M. Dulieu-Barton, “An Overview of Intelligent Fault Detection in Systems and Structures,” Struct. Heal. Monit. An Int. J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 85–98, Mar. 2004.

[2] B. Lei, N. Wang, P. Xu, and G. Song, "New Crack Detection Method for Bridge Inspection Using UAV Incorporating Image Processing," J. Aerosp. Eng., vol. 31, no. 5, p. 04018058, Sep. 2018.

[3] S. B. Im, S. Hurlebaus, and Y. J. Kang, "Summary Review of GPS Technology for Structural Health Monitoring," J. Struct. Eng., vol. 139, no. 10, pp. 1653–1664, Oct. 2013.

[4] V. Gattulli, M. Lepidi, and F. Potenza, "Dynamic testing and health monitoring of historic and modern civil structures in Italy," Struct. Monit. Maint., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 71–90, Mar.2016.

[5] A. Guarnieri, N. Milan, and A. Vettore, "Monitoring of Complex Structure For Structural Control Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning (Tls) And Photogrammetry," Int. J. Archit.Herit., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 54–67, Jan. 2013.

[6] F. Nex and F. Remondino, "UAV for 3D mapping applications: a review," Appl. Geomatics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–15, Mar. 2014.

[7] L. Duque, J. Seo, and J. Wacker, "Bridge Deterioration Quantification Protocol Using UAV," J. Bridg. Eng., vol. 23, no. 10, p. 04018080, Oct. 2018.

[8] A. Khaloo, D. Lattanzi, K. Cunningham, R. Dell'Andrea, and M. Riley, "Unmanned aerial vehicle inspection of the Placer River Trail Bridge through image-based 3D modeling," Struct. Infrastructure. Eng., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 124–136, Jan. 2018.

[9] A. Murtiyoso and P. Grussenmeyer, "Documentation of heritage buildings using closerange UAV images: dense matching issues, comparison and case studies," Photogramm. Rec., vol. 32, no. 159, pp. 206–229, Sep. 2017.

[10] D. Germanese, G. Leone, D. Moroni, M. Pascali, and M. Tampucci, "Long-Term Monitoring of Crack Patterns in Historic Structures Using UAVs and Planar Markers: A Preliminary Study," J. Imaging, vol. 4, no. 8, p. 99, Aug. 2018.

[11] M. Gul and F. N. Catbas, "Ambient Vibration Data Analysis for Structural Identification and Global Condition Assessment," J. Eng. Mech., vol. 134, no. 8, pp. 650–662, Aug. 2008.

[12] A. Elyamani, O. Caselles, P. Roca, and F. Clapes, “Dynamic investigation of a large historical cathedral,” Struct. Control Health Monit., vol 24, no. 3, pp. 1-25, May. 2016.

[13] C. Gentile, A. Ruccolo, and F. Canali, “Continuous Monitoring of the Milan Cathedral: dynamic characteristics and vibration-based SHM,” Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, vol. 9, pp. 671-688, Oct. 2019.

[14] K.-W. Chiang, M.-L. Tsai, and C.-H. Chu, "The Development of an UAV Borne Direct Georeferenced Photogrammetric Platform for Ground Control Point Free Applications," Sensors, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 9161–9180, Jul. 2012.

[15] B. Grayson, N. T. Penna, J. P. Mills, and D. S. Grant, "GPS precise point positioning for UAV photogrammetry," Photogramm. Rec., vol. 33, no. 164, pp. 427–447, Dec. 2018.

[16] R. Arroyo Matus, S. Sanchez Tizapa, T. Tapia, and E. Herrera, “Diagnosis of the behavior observed during the earthquake of Zumpango, Guerrero, (Mw-6.5) of December 11, 2011 and proposals to reduce structural vulnerability” Tlamati, vol 5, no. 2, 2014.

[17] M. Romero, P. Pachón, V. Compán, M. Cámara, and F. Pinto, “ Operational Modal Analysis: A tool for assessing changes os structural health of historical constructions after consolidation and reinforcement works-Jura Chapel (Jerez de la Frontera, Spain),” Shock and Vibration, vol. 2018, pp. 1-12, Aug. 2018.

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 30/11/21
Submitted on 30/11/21

Volume Structural health monitoring, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.268
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score


Views 6
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?