Abstract

Two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) models are commonly used in the evaluation and benchmarking of sustainable operations and processes across multiple research fields. To date, however, little attention has been given to the unrealistic weight distribution and weak discrimination power in the modeling and evaluation of the two-stage sustainable operations when using two-stage DEA models. In order to overcome this methodological weakness, we use the multiple criteria DEA (MCDEA) approach in the evaluation of the two-stage processes. The outcome is a multiple criteria two-stage DEA model which yields more realistic weights for the inputs and outputs and thus has better discrimination power than traditional two-stage DEA models. The developed model is tested and validated by assessing the sustainable design performances of a sample of car product designs.


Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

http://juuli.fi/Record/0278435716
https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1361920916302309?httpAccept=text/xml,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.04.008 under the license https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/
http://dro.deakin.edu.au/view/DU:30092339,
https://trid.trb.org/view/1409626,
https://core.ac.uk/display/148711511,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2346457941
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2016

Volume 2016, 2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2016.04.008
Licence: Other

Document Score

0

Views 1
Recommendations 0

Share this document

Keywords

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?