This paper explores how preventive conservation for built heritage is promoted and implemented around Europe, compares the different practices, and identifies some of the necessary conditions for them to be effective and successful. It pulls together a broad range of initiatives including recently launched and lesser known schemes. Since Monumentenwacht was introduced in Netherlands, similar inspection service schemes have been launched in nine European countries. Comparative analysis shows a great diversity in their management, the spectrum of services, sources of income and other aspects. Other important models contributing to the improved maintenance of built environment include heritage centres, databases of contractors, one-off campaigns, conservation manuals, and maintenanceenforcement. Interdependencies observed between them suggest that their co-existence is essential for preventive conservation system to be truly effective.

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document


[1] Proceedings of the First International Conference Monumentenwacht in Amsterdam, Netherlands held in 2000 (2002).

[2] Monumentenwacht Netherlands. https://www.monumenten.nl Accessed July 2019.

[3] Correspondence with Viltė Janušauskaitė (Head of Projects Department at the state owned enterprise Lietuvos paminklai; project FIXUS). July-August 2019.

[4] Vandesande, Aziliz. Preventive Conservation Strategy for Built Heritage Aimed at Sustainable Management and Local Development (2017), 81.

[5] Goeleven, Carolien. “Monumentenwacht” (2016). http://www.changes-project.eu/wp content/uploads/2016/01/2016_05_26_Monza_Goedleven.pdf Accessed 30 July 2019.

[6] Proceedings of the conference “Introducing and Running Preventive Maintenance Services for Cultural Heritage Buildings”, Budapest, 2014.

[7] Dann, Nigel. “Planned and Preventative Conservation & England: Experiences, Opportunities and Requirements”. Preventive and planned conservation conference, Monza, Montova, 2014.

[8] Correspondence with Sonya Linskaill (manager of the TBHC) in July-August 2019, and in person interview in Edinburgh on 8 August 2019.

[9] Monumentenwacht Noord-Brabant. “Noord-Brabant Meerjarenbeleidsplan 2019-2021”. https://mwnb.nl/2019/03/08/meerjarenbeleidsplan-2019-2021/ Accessed 19 July 2019.

[10] Correspondence with Viltė Janušauskaitė (manager of FIXUS) and Branislav Reznik (manager of ProMonumenta). July –August 2019.

[11] EEA Grants Lithuania. Medinių langų ir durų restauravimas. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBiTWFtu58g. Accessed on 30 April 2020.

[12] Correspondense with Elo Lutsepp (Head of the Centre of Rural Architecture, Estonian Open Air Museum). August 13, 2019.

[13] Correspondence with Dorothy Hoskins, Technical Outreach and Education Manager with Historic Environment Scotland (HES). July 26, 2019.

[14] Scottish Government. “Scottish house condition survey 2016: key findings”. https://www.gov.scot/publications/scottish-house-condition-survey-2016-key findings/pages/8/ Accessed 5 July 2019.

[15] BBC News. “Very little done since Edinburgh falling masonry death“. www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-48526542 Accessed 25 July 2019.

[16] In-person interview with Jocelyn Cunliffe (architect, member of the Tenement Action Group) in Edinburgh on 30 July 2019.

[17] The European Commission. „Global Status Report 2017”. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/020_fatih_birol_seif_paris_11-12- 17.pdf Accessed 20 July 2019.

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 30/11/21
Submitted on 30/11/21

Volume Management of heritage structures and conservation strategies, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.195
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score


Views 7
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?