The archaeological site of Pompeii is an extraordinary evidence of Roman architectural heritage which comprehends a large number of masonry constructions, buried after the Vesuvius eruption in 79 AD. They were discovered in the XVIII century when renewed cultural interest induced numerous archaeological excavations. In this scenario, the remains of the Roman aqueduct system, i.e. Castellum Aquae system [1], includes a series of approximately 6 m height masonry water towers (WTs). Among the fourteen surveyed, four free-standing towers (i.e. no. 1, 2, 3 and 4) have been investigated in 2015 by means of nondestructive techniques (sonic pulse velocity tests, ground penetrating radar (GPR), ambient vibration tests), aimed at gathering information on the constructive systems and the current conservation state, as well as data on the overall dynamic behaviour. According to the on-site inspections outcomes, 3D finite element models of the towers were constructed and calibrated on the results of operational modal analysis (OMA) [2]. The model updating procedure was able to describe and simulate the soil-structure interaction, introducing a Winkler elastic soil model, and to define the elastic parameters of masonry. This paper describes the seismic vulnerability assessment of the four WTs, considering both equilibrium capacity and material strength, performing analytical kinematic analyses and numerical finite element modelling. Aiming at improving the previous studies [3], equivalent modal parameters (i.e. natural frequencies and mode shapes) are used to calibrate analytical models and furtherly refine FE model updating. The numerical models were generated using DIANA software [4], implementing a nonlinear constitutive law for masonry material, i.e. total strain crack model. Afterwards, sensitivity analyses are performed to calibrate both the elastic properties of materials and the Winkler springs’ stiffness. Eventually, analytical kinematic approach and FE pushover analyses (with uniform and modal force distribution) are executed to assess the seismic vulnerability of the WTs, according to Italian code [5]. Results of the analyses are presented and discussed. The study was the occasion to compare the results of kinematic and numerical procedures applied to archaeological structures. The results report the FE approach as more conservative than kinematic model. Thus, the importance to adopt a combined global (numerical) and local (limit analysis) approach in the assessment of archaeological structures is stressed.

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document


[1] C. Ohlig (2001), De aquis Pompeiorum: das Castellum Aquae in Pompeii: Herlunft, Zuleitung und Verteilung des Wassers, Nimègue, 2001.

[2] F. Lorenzoni, M.R. Valluzzi, M. Salvalaggio, A. Minello, C. Modena (2017), Operational modal analysis for the characterization of ancient water towers in Pompeii, In Procedia Engineering, Volume 199, 2017, Pages 3374-3379, ISSN 1877-7058, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.446

[3] A. Pappas, F. da Porto, C. Modena, H. Dessales, “Seismic vulnerability assessment of ancient water towers in Pompeii with kinematic, finite element and discrete element analysis”. In: ANIDIS 2013 – L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia, (2013)

[4] DIANA FEA, DIANA 10.3 Finite Element Analysis User Guide, TNO DIANA BV, Delft, 2019

[5] D. M. 17 gennaio 2018, Norme tecniche per le costruzioni, Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, 2018 (in Italian)

[6] T. L. Heres, “The structures related to the water supply of Pompeii: materials and chronology,” Mededelingen Van Het Nederlands Instituut Te Rome, vol. 51/52, pp. 42-61, 1992-1993.

[7] Dessales H. (2008), “D’eau et de pierre. Recherches des laboratoires d’archéologie et de géologie de l’Ecole normale supérieure sur le Réseau hydraulique de Pompéei et son bâti.,” 2008.

[8] J. Carlut, H. Dessales, & J. de Sigoyer (2012). D’eau et de pierre: le reseau hydraluique de Pompei et son bati. Paris, France (in French)

[9] Bowles J. E., Foundation analysis and design, McGraw-Hill, USA, 1996, pp. 121-127, 501- 509

[10] Elyamani A., Integrated monitoring and structural analysis strategies for the study of large historical construction. Application to Mallorca cathedral. PhD Thesis. Director. Roca P., Universitat Politecnica de Catlunya, 2015.

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 30/11/21
Submitted on 30/11/21

Volume Numerical modeling and structural analysis, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.223
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score


Views 17
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?