Comparing Signal Setting Design Methods through emissions and fuel consumption performance indicators

Abstract

In order to address the Signal Setting Design at urban level two main approaches may be pursued: the coordination and the synchronisation approaches depending on the steps considered for the optimisation of decision variables (two steps vs. one step). Furthermore, in terms of objective functions mono-criterion or multi-criteria may be adopted. In this paper the coordination approach is implemented considering the multi-criteria optimisation at single junctions and mono-criterion optimisation at network level whereas the synchronisation is implemented considering the mono-criterion optimisation. The main purpose of the paper is the evaluation of the performances of two strategies not only considering indicators such as the total delay, the queue length etc. but also considering other indicators such as the emissions and the fuel consumption. The methodological framework is composed by three stages: (i) the decision variables (green timings and offsets) computation through optimisation methods; (ii) the implementation of optimal signal settings in a microscopic traffic flow simulator (“Simulation of Urban MObility”-SUMO); (iii) the estimation of emissions and fuel consumption indicators.

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

• http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/108854/1/2016%20Comparing%20Signal%20Setting%20Design%20Methods.pdf

• http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-48944-5_19,

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48944-5_19 under the license http://www.springer.com/tdm

• https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-48944-5_19,

https://www.iris.unisa.it/handle/11386/4675051,

http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/108854,

https://www.scipedia.com/public/De_Luca_et_al_2016a,

https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2548390440