Abstract

Banat seismic region represents the second most important seismic area of Romania. The area is characterized by shallow earthquakes, with a peak ground acceleration ag=0,20g [1]. The city was influenced by several architectural styles, keeping until nowadays many valuable masonry historical buildings. Most of the historical buildings present severe decay due to the lack of proper maintenance over time. Timisoara was selected to be European Capital of Culture 2021, so the buildings in the historical districts are expected to be visited by a large amount of tourists. This paper presents the seismic vulnerability assessment of two of the most important historical urban districts of Timisoara. The evaluation is based on existing Italian vulnerability assessment methodology [2], following on-site investigation. Moreover, there is considered also the influence of the cultural value of the historical buildings. Following a set of new proposed architectural-artistic, urbanistic and social-economic factors, there was developed a new investigation form, presented and explained in the paper [1]. In the end, the authors present a detailed empirical seismic vulnerability assessment influenced by the cultural value for historical masonry buildings in Timisoara city, Romania. This study could help the local authorities to realize prioritization lists for rehabilitation work, considering first the historical buildings that are the most important for the local community identity. The cultural value and the history of a city must be well known and promoted.

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document

References

[1] M. Mosoarca, I. Onescu, E. Onescu, B. Azap, N. Chieffo, M. Szitar-Sirbu, Seismic vulnerability assessment for the historical areas of the Timisoara city, Romania, Eng. Fail. Anal. 101 (2019) 86–112. doi:10.1016/J.ENGFAILANAL.2019.03.013.

[2] A. Formisano, F. Mazzolani, G. Florio, R. Landolfo, A quick methodology for seismic vulnerability assessement of historical masonry aggregates, COST Action C26 Urban Habitat Constr. under Catastrophic Events. (2010). doi:10.13140/2.1.1706.3686.

[3] S. Chen, Hazard Mitigation for Earthquake and Subsequent Fire, ANCER Annual Meeting: Networking of Young Earthquake Engineering Researchers and Professionals (2004).

[4] G. E. Ericksen, J. F. Concha, and E. Silgado, The Cusco, Peru, Earthquake of May 21, 1950, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1954), vol. 44, no. 2A, pp. 97–112.

[5] A. S. Pereira, The opportunity of a disaster: The economic impact of the 1755 Lisbon earthquake, Journal of Economic History (2009), vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 466–499.

[6] A. Kaiser et al., The Mw 6.2 Christchurch earthquake of February 2011: Preliminary report, New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics (2012), vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 67–90.

[7] I. Onescu, Seismic vulnerability assessment of historical urban centers, Ph.D. thesis (2020).

[8] A. Bala and V. Raileanu, Crustal seismicity and active fault systems in Romania, International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management (2015), SGEM, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 799–806.

[9] E. Oros, Macroseismic and instrumental seismicity of the Banat Region and its significance on the local seismic hazard and risk, in Proc. and CD-Rom of the “Thirty Years from the Romania Earthquake of March 4, 1977” Symposium (2007).

[10] M. Kostov, Site specific estimation of cumulative absolute velocity, in 18th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 18) (2005) , Beijing, China.

[11] M. Opris, Timisoara - small urbanistic monography, In Romanian. Bucuresti: Editura Tehnica (1987).

[12] M. Mosoarca, I. Onescu, E. Onescu, B. Azap, N. Chieffo, and M. Szitar-Sirbu, Seismic vulnerability assessment for the historical areas of the Timisoara city, Romania, Engineering Failure Analysis (2019), vol. 101, pp. 86–112.

[13] D. Benedetti and V. Petrini, On the seismic vulnerability of masonry buildings: an evaluation method (in Italian), L’Industria delle Costruzioni (1984), vol. 149, pp. 66–74.

[14] A. Formisano, R. Landolfo, F. Mazzolani, and G. Florio, A quick methodology for seismic vulnerability assessement of historical masonry aggregates, COST Action C26: Urban Habitat Constructions under Catastrophic Events (2010), no. September.

[15] Mosoarca M., Onescu I., Onescu E., Anastasiadis A., Seismic vulnerability assessment methodology for historical masonry buildings in the near-field areas, Engineering Failure Analysis (2020), Vol. 115.

[16] R. Vicente, S. Parodi, S. Lagomarsino, H. Varum, J. A. R. Mendes, and D. Silva, Seismic vulnerability assessment, damage scenarios and loss estimation. Case study of the old city centre of Coimbra, Portugal, in Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (2008).

Back to Top
GET PDF

Document information

Published on 30/11/21
Submitted on 30/11/21

Volume Vulnerability and risk analysis, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.236
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 5
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?