Abstract

Distributed pipeline assets systems are crucial to society. The deterioration of these assets and the optimal allocation of limited budget for their maintenance correspond to crucial challenges for water utility managers. Decision makers should be assisted with optimal solutions to select the best maintenance plan concerning available resources and management strategies. Much research effort has been dedicated to the development of optimal strategies for maintenance of water pipes. Most of the maintenance strategies are intended for scheduling individual water pipe. Consideration of optimal group scheduling replacement jobs for groups of pipes or other linear assets has so far not received much attention in literature. It is a common practice that replacement planners select two or three pipes manually with ambiguous criteria to group into one replacement job. This is obviously not the best solution for job grouping and may not be cost effective, especially when total cost can be up to multiple million dollars. In this paper, an optimal group scheduling scheme with three decision criteria for distributed pipeline assets maintenance decision is proposed. A Maintenance Grouping Optimization (MGO) model with multiple criteria is developed. An immediate challenge of such modeling is to deal with scalability of vast combinatorial solution space. To address this issue, a modified genetic algorithm is developed together with a Judgment Matrix. This Judgment Matrix is corresponding to various combinations of pipe replacement schedules. An industrial case study based on a section of a real water distribution network was conducted to test the new model. The results of the case study show that new schedule generated a significant cost reduction compared with the schedule without grouping pipes.


Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icqr2mse.2011.5976684
http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.ieee-000005976684,
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5976684,
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5976684,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2106311176
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2011

Volume 2011, 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icqr2mse.2011.5976684
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 1
Recommendations 0

Share this document

Keywords

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?