Abstract

E-bikes are bicycles that provide pedal-assistance to aid people in cycling. Because of the potential of promoting sustainable transportation, more attention has been focused on the e-bike market. This paper investigates the differences of the cycling experience and perceptions between e-bike and conventional bicycle users, using samples drawn from independent bicycle dealer customers. A total of 806 respondents in the United States took the on-line survey, including 363 e-bike-owning respondents. The results show that e-bikes play a more important role in utilitarian travel, such as commuting and running errands, compared to a conventional bicycle. Conventional bicycle-owning respondents use their bicycles more for recreation and exercise. Also, e-bike owners tend to bike longer distances and take more trips per week. Both e-bike respondents and bicycle respondents stated that improved health was a key factor for cycling, while Millennials and Generation X respondents cycle to save time and improve the environment. Finally, an ordered logit model is proposed for evaluating factors that influence interest in future e-bike ownership. Travel purpose, e-bike familiarity, annual household income, and education level are statistically significant factors in the model. These findings begin to provide insight and a profile of potential new markets for e-bikes in the United States.

Document type: Article

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_civipubs/22,
https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cengin_fac/565,
https://pubag.nal.usda.gov/catalog/6520334,
https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1584&context=cengin_fac,
https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i9p1662-d112482.html,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2755205157 under the license cc-by
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su9091662
https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050 under the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2017

Volume 2017, 2017
DOI: 10.3390/su9091662
Licence: Other

Document Score

0

Views 6
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?