Seismic behavior of buried pipelines constructed by design criteria and construction specifications of both Korea and the US

Abstract

Earthquake loss estimation systems in the US, for example HAZUS (Hazard in US), have been established based on sufficient damage records for the purpose of prevention and efficient response to earthquake hazards; however, in Korea, insufficient data sets of earthquakes and damage records are currently available. In this study, the earthquake damages to pipelines in Korea using the pipeline repair rate (RR) recommended in HAZUS was reevaluated with the degree of confidence when RR is used without modification for the damage estimation of pipelines in Korea. The numerical analyses using a commercial finite element model, ABAQUS, were carried out to compare stresses and strains mobilized in both brittle and ductile pipelines constructed by the design criteria and construction specifications of both Korea and the US. These pipelines were embedded in dense sand overlying three different in situ soils (clay, sand, and gravel) subjected to earthquake excitations with peak ground accelerations (PGAs) of 0.2 to 1.2 g and 1994 Northridge and 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake loadings. The numerical results show that differences in the stress and strain rates are less than 10%. This implies that RR in HAZUS can be used for earthquake damage estimation of pipelines with a 90% confidence level in Korea.

Document type: Article

Full document

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

• https://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/13/2271/2013 under the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by

• https://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/13/2271/2013/nhess-13-2271-2013.pdf

• http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/13/2271/2013/nhess-13-2271-2013.pdf,

https://doaj.org/toc/1561-8633,

https://doaj.org/toc/1684-9981 under the license cc-by

• https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/13/2271/2013/nhess-13-2271-2013.pdf,

http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2271-2013

• https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/13/2271/2013/nhess-13-2271-2013.pdf,

https://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/13/2271/2013/nhess-13-2271-2013.pdf,

http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/13/2271/2013/nhess-13-2271-2013.pdf,

http://core.ac.uk/display/25838124,

http://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013NHESD...1..389J/abstract,

https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/13/2271/2013/nhess-13-2271-2013.html,

https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2009610245 under the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

• https://nhess.copernicus.org/preprints/1/389/2013/nhessd-1-389-2013.pdf,

http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/nhessd-1-389-2013

under the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

DOIS: 10.5194/nhess-13-2271-2013 10.5194/nhessd-1-389-2013