Abstract

International audience; Targeted metagenomics, also known as metagenetics, is a high-throughput sequencing application focusing on a nucleotide target in a microbiome to describe its taxonomic content. A wide range of bioinformatics pipelines are available to analyze sequencing outputs, and the choice of an appropriate tool is crucial and not trivial. No standard evaluation method exists for estimating the accuracy of a pipeline for targeted metagenomics analyses. This article proposes an evaluation protocol containing real and simulated targeted metage-nomics datasets, and adequate metrics allowing us to study the impact of different variables on the biological interpretation of results. This protocol was used to compare six different bioinformatics pipelines in the basic user context: Three common ones (mothur, QIIME and BMP) based on a clustering-first approach and three emerging ones (Kraken, CLARK and One Codex) using an assignment-first approach. This study surprisingly reveals that the effect of sequencing errors has a bigger impact on the results that choosing different amplified regions. Moreover, increasing sequencing throughput increases richness overestima-tion, even more so for microbiota of high complexity. Finally, the choice of the reference database has a bigger impact on richness estimation for clustering-first pipelines, and on correct taxa identification for assignment-first pipelines. Using emerging assignment-first pipelines is a valid approach for targeted metagenomics analyses, with a quality of results comparable to popular clustering-first pipelines, even with an error-prone sequencing technology like Ion Torrent. However, those pipelines are highly sensitive to the quality of databases and their annotations, which makes clustering-first pipelines still the only reliable approach for studying microbiomes that are not well described.

Document type: Article

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169563 under the license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01575755/document,
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01575755/file/journal.pone.0169563.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28052134,
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01575755/document,
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01575755,
http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28052134,
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017PLoSO..1269563S/abstract,
https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169563,
https://paperity.org/p/80231307/assessment-of-common-and-emerging-bioinformatics-pipelines-for-targeted-metagenomics,
https://core.ac.uk/display/149652434,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2570945670
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2017

Volume 2017, 2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169563
Licence: Other

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?