Abstract

Previous literature suggests that haptic gas pedals can assist the driver in search of maximum fuel economy. This study investigated three haptic pedal designs, each with high and low intensities of feedback, in a rapid prototyping, paired comparison design. Twenty drivers took part, experiencing the systems in a high-fidelity driving simulator. Results suggested that drivers were best guided towards an “idealized” (most fuel efficient) gas pedal position by force feedback (where a driver feels a step change in gas pedal force) as opposed to stiffness feedback (where a driver feels a changing gas pedal firmness). In either case, high levels of force/stiffness feedback were preferred. Objective performance measures mirrored the subjective results. Whilst the short-term nature (brief system exposure) of this study led to difficulties in drawing longer-term conclusions, it would appear that force feedback haptics are better suited than stiffness feedback to augment an effective driver interface supporting “green” driving.


Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

http://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1499&context=drivingassessment,
https://ir.uiowa.edu/drivingassessment/2013/papers/42,
https://core.ac.uk/display/129643828,
https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1263841,
http://drivingassessment.uiowa.edu/sites/default/files/DA2013/Papers/042_Jamson_0.pdf,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1483356441
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2017

Volume 2017, 2017
DOI: 10.17077/drivingassessment.1499
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

Keywords

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?