Copyright © 2014 Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VGTU) Press. In academia as in practice, seaports are increasingly viewed as elements in supply chains. It is argued that seaports should add value to shippers by aligning their own business activities with shippers Supply Chain Management (SCM) strategies and requirements. The implications of this port-SCM philosophy are not fully explored, however. In this context, it is especially important to create mutual understanding between shippers, in terms of their SCM strategies, and port actors, in terms of services provided. In this paper a framework is developed, which aims to improve mutual understanding between shippers and port actors from a SCM point of view. It thereby aims to contribute to the dialogue on how the port logistics system can be better integrated into shippers SCM strategies. Three SCM reference models are analysed and twelve SCM subsystems identified that represent broad design areas of shippers SCM strategies. Further, the seaport system is discussed in terms of system boundaries and the actors involved. Port actors and SCM subsystems are then combined into one explanatory framework, the SCM-port actor matrix. Finally, applying the matrix, three cases retrieved from academic and trade literature in which port actors are actively involved in conducting shippers supply chain strategies are discussed. The paper concludes with a brief outlook on future research needs. 2014

Document type: Article

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:


DOIS: 10.3846/16484142.2014.982173 10.15480/882.2345

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2014

Volume 2014, 2014
DOI: 10.3846/16484142.2014.982173
Licence: Other

Document Score


Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?