Abstract

Stub autonomous systems usually utilize multiple links to single or multiple ISPs. Today, inbound traffic engineering is considered hard, as there is no direct way to influence routing decisions on remote systems with BGP. Current traffic engineering methods built on top of BGP are heuristic and time-consuming. The Locator/Identifier Separation Protocol (LISP) promises to change that. In this paper, we conduct the first comprehensive evaluation of LISP and its built-in traffic engineering methods on a real-world testbed. First, we compare LISP to plain BGP and BGP advertising more specific prefixes. This comparison shows that LISP allows effective load-balancing with an accuracy of approximately 5%, while being easier to configure than BGP and its variants. Further experiments show that these results are independent from the number of concurrent streams.


Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

http://xplorestaging.ieee.org/ielx7/6916486/6925725/06925816.pdf?arnumber=6925816,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/lcn.2014.6925816
https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/lcn/lcn2014.html#HerrmannTKS14,
http://tubiblio.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/77489,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2054406380
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2014

Volume 2014, 2014
DOI: 10.1109/lcn.2014.6925816
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?