Abstract

In sectorless air traffic management the airspace is considered as one piece instead of partitioning it into sectors. The air traffic controllers are no longer in charge of sectors but are given responsibility for a certain number of aircraft during their entire flight. This entails that the controller has to keep track of several different traffic situations geographically spread out over a potentially large area. Of course, such a considerable change of concept has implications on the controllers' mental model and the way conflicts are solved. This paper describes the shift of the controller's mental model away from one geographically limited view with long-term planning to several global views with short-term planning. It is illustrated how this altered mental model also implies changes of the controller's tasks and conflict solving. Real-time simulations within DLR's LRM2020 project have shown that working with a sectorless concept is possible and feasible if the co ntroller is supported by suitable conflict detection. The details and results of these simulations are given and the effects of the altered mental model are analyzed. It is furthermore explained how a sectorless concept could change controller work away from controller teams consisting of executive and planner to a one-person workplace supported by a conflict detection. At the same time the principle that two pairs of eyes are better than one is retained. The controller's tasks are not reduced to monitoring jobs but the essential conflict avoidance task remains.


Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/dasc.2011.6096100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/dasc.2011.6096264
https://elib.dlr.de/71614,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2093563705


DOIS: 10.1109/dasc.2011.6096264 10.1109/dasc.2011.6096100

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2011

Volume 2011, 2011
DOI: 10.1109/dasc.2011.6096264
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

Keywords

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?