Abstract

Most congestion control algorithms try to emulate processor sharing (PS) by giving each competing flow an equal share of a bottleneck link. This approach leads to fairness, and prevents long flows from hogging resources. For example, if a set of flows with the same round trip time share a bottleneck link, TCP’s congestion control mechanism tries to achieve PS; so do most of the proposed alternatives, such as eXplicit Control Protocol (XCP). But although they emulate PS well in a static scenario when all flows are long-lived, they do not come close to PS when new flows arrive randomly and have a finite amount of data to send, as is the case in today’s Internet. Typically, flows take an order of magnitude longer to complete with TCP or XCP than with PS, suggesting large room for improvement. And so in this paper, we explore how a new congestion control algorithm — Rate Control Protocol (RCP) — comes much closer to emulating PS over a broad range of operating conditions. In RCP, a router assigns a single rate to all flows that pass through it. The router does not keep flow-state, and does no per-packet calculations. Yet we are able to show that under a wide range of traffic characteristics and network conditions, RCP’s performance is very close to ideal processor sharing.


Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11499169_22
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F11499169_22,
http://nms.lcs.mit.edu/6829-papers/RCP1.pdf,
https://core.ac.uk/display/24572077,
https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/iwqos/iwqos2005.html#DukkipatiKRM05,
https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2103204,
https://rd.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/11499169_22,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1579768150
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2005

Volume 2005, 2005
DOI: 10.1007/11499169_22
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?