Abstract

The quest towards increasing the energy density of traction battery technologies has led to the emergence and diversification of battery materials. The lithium sulfur battery (LSB) is in this regard a promising material for batteries due to its specific energy. However, due to its low volumetric energy density, the LSB faces challenges in mobility applications such as electric vehicles but also other transportation modes. To understand the potential environmental implication of LSB batteries, a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was performed. For this study, electrodes for both an NMC111 with an anode graphite and a LSB battery cell with a lithium metal foil as anode were manufactured. Data from disassembly experiments performed on a real battery system for a mid-size passenger vehicle were used to build the required life cycle inventory. The energy consumption during the use phase was calculated using a simulative approach. A set of thirteen impact categories was evaluated and characterized with the ReCiPe methodology. The results of the LCA in this study allow identification of the main sources of environmental problems as well as possible strategies to improve the environmental impact of LSB batteries. In this regard, the high requirements of N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) for the processing of the sulfur cathode and the thickness of the lithium foil were identified as the most important drivers. We make recommendations for necessary further research in order to broaden the understanding concerning the potential environmental implication of the implementation of LSB batteries for mobility applications.

Document type: Article

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073 under the license cc-by
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en11010150
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:084-2018012510494,
https://publikationsserver.tu-braunschweig.de/receive/dbbs_mods_00065513,
https://publikationsserver.tu-braunschweig.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/dbbs_derivate_00044254/Cerdas-energies-11-00150.pdf,
http://uri.gbv.de/document/gvk:ppn:1011566699,
http://publikationsserver.tu-braunschweig.de/get/65513,
http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/1/150 under the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
http://publikationsserver.tu-braunschweig.de/get/65513,
https://publikationsserver.tu-braunschweig.de/receive/dbbs_mods_00065513?r=205341,
https://core.ac.uk/display/151141327,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2782781034
https://juser.fz-juelich.de/search?p=id:%22FZJ-2018-04873%22
  • [ ]
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2018

Volume 2018, 2018
DOI: 10.3390/en11010150
Licence: Other

Document Score

0

Views 4
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?