The accelerated deterioration of flexible pavement and its relation to design strength requirements is a major problem facing highway engineers. The goal of this research is to investigate a possible relationship between the accelerated pavement deterioration rates and pavement design strength using a two-stage design analysis approach. The approach in this study applies a two-stage solution to the three popular design methods of flexible pavement (i.e. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) method, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) method, and the Asphalt Institute (AI) method) to yield pavement designs using stage load applications values specified for each investigated design load applications level. The resulting two-stage pavement designs are then used to obtain an indicator called the stage design strength ratio (percentage) defined as the ratio of the relative strength change to the design relative strength. The sample results indicate that the stage design strength ratio is relatively low compared to the corresponding increase in load applications especially at advanced service times. This could be a major contributing factor to the accelerated deterioration of flexible pavement. Therefore, it is recommended to provide initially stronger pavement structures. This can be done by either designing flexible pavement for a longer design period than the typical 20 years suggested by most design methods or using a higher terminal present serviceability index as in the case of the AASHTO design method.

Document type: Article

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12544-011-0047-4 under the license cc-by
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2033279256 under the license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2011

Volume 2011, 2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12544-011-0047-4
Licence: Other

Document Score


Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?