m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 589210339 to Sousa et al 2002a) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This article evaluates the use of Priority Queueing models to achieve delay differentiation in IP networks operating under the Class of Services paradigm. Three models are considered: proportional model, additive model and a novel hybrid schema based on the upper time limit model. The characteristics, behaviour and viability of these models are analysed as regards traffic delay differentiation. The impact of each model on traffic aggregation and on individual flows is also evaluated. This study is complemented by the analysis of delay differentiation from an end-to-end perspective. An adaptive differentiation mechanism is also proposed and discussed. (undefined) | This article evaluates the use of Priority Queueing models to achieve delay differentiation in IP networks operating under the Class of Services paradigm. Three models are considered: proportional model, additive model and a novel hybrid schema based on the upper time limit model. The characteristics, behaviour and viability of these models are analysed as regards traffic delay differentiation. The impact of each model on traffic aggregation and on individual flows is also evaluated. This study is complemented by the analysis of delay differentiation from an end-to-end perspective. An adaptive differentiation mechanism is also proposed and discussed. (undefined) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
Line 17: | Line 12: | ||
* [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F3-540-47906-6_57.pdf https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F3-540-47906-6_57.pdf] | * [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F3-540-47906-6_57.pdf https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F3-540-47906-6_57.pdf] | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/3-540-47906-6_57 http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/3-540-47906-6_57], | ||
+ | : [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47906-6_57 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47906-6_57] | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-47906-6_57 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-47906-6_57], | ||
+ | : [https://core.ac.uk/display/55603996 https://core.ac.uk/display/55603996], | ||
+ | : [https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/networking/networking2002.html#SousaCF02 https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/networking/networking2002.html#SousaCF02], | ||
+ | : [https://www.scipedia.com/public/Sousa_et_al_2002a https://www.scipedia.com/public/Sousa_et_al_2002a], | ||
+ | : [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1855996719 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1855996719] | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [ ] |
This article evaluates the use of Priority Queueing models to achieve delay differentiation in IP networks operating under the Class of Services paradigm. Three models are considered: proportional model, additive model and a novel hybrid schema based on the upper time limit model. The characteristics, behaviour and viability of these models are analysed as regards traffic delay differentiation. The impact of each model on traffic aggregation and on individual flows is also evaluated. This study is complemented by the analysis of delay differentiation from an end-to-end perspective. An adaptive differentiation mechanism is also proposed and discussed. (undefined)
The different versions of the original document can be found in:
Published on 01/01/2002
Volume 2002, 2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47906-6_57
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?