Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
'''Abstract.''' The last decades there is a strong interest in predicting cavitation dynamics as it is a prerequisite in order to predict cavitation erosion. Industrial applications require accurate results in an acceptable time span and as a result there is a focus on large scale dynamics. In this paper the RANS equations are used to investigate the shedding frequency of sheet cavities in two-dimensional simulations. First a verification study is made for the NACA 0015 in 6 degrees angle of incidence. A grid sensitivity study is conducted in wetted flow and in steady (non-shedding) cavitating condition (σ=1.6). Then an investigation is conducted in order to capture the shedding frequency. The results show that only when a correction for turbulent viscosity at the cavity-water interface is used it was possible to capture the shedding frequency as found in other numerical studies. Furthermore, a validation study is conducted on a NACA66-312 α=0.8 for two different angles of attack. The obtained results are compared and validated with the experimental data from Leroux ''et al''. They indicate that the 2D shedding frequency predicted by the numerical simulations is in good agreement with the frequency obtained in the experiment.
 
'''Abstract.''' The last decades there is a strong interest in predicting cavitation dynamics as it is a prerequisite in order to predict cavitation erosion. Industrial applications require accurate results in an acceptable time span and as a result there is a focus on large scale dynamics. In this paper the RANS equations are used to investigate the shedding frequency of sheet cavities in two-dimensional simulations. First a verification study is made for the NACA 0015 in 6 degrees angle of incidence. A grid sensitivity study is conducted in wetted flow and in steady (non-shedding) cavitating condition (σ=1.6). Then an investigation is conducted in order to capture the shedding frequency. The results show that only when a correction for turbulent viscosity at the cavity-water interface is used it was possible to capture the shedding frequency as found in other numerical studies. Furthermore, a validation study is conducted on a NACA66-312 α=0.8 for two different angles of attack. The obtained results are compared and validated with the experimental data from Leroux ''et al''. They indicate that the 2D shedding frequency predicted by the numerical simulations is in good agreement with the frequency obtained in the experiment.
−
 
−
==5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS==
 
−
 
−
In this study an attempt was made to verify the incompressible RANS solver in StarCCM+ in cavitating flow. Despite the three-dimensional character of cavitation dynamics a first investigation was conducted on the grid and numerical (time step, inner iterations etc.) sensitivity with the intension to predict the shedding frequency using two-dimensional domain. For the current computational set-up and the tested conditions the following conclusions are drawn:
 
−
 
−
:* When a steady sheet cavity is predicted the effect of the time step and the number of the inner iteration on the results are negligible. However, the grid density had a slight impact on the shape of the sheet cavity.
 
−
 
−
:* In the unsteady condition, on the other hand, the time step and the number of inner iterations per time step seem to play an important role on the prediction of the shedding frequency. A higher frequency was captured only when the correction for the turbulence viscosity in areas with higher vapor volume was applied. Without the correction the effect of the re-entrant jet could not be captured thoroughly, leading to a “delayed” shedding and consequently to a lower shedding frequency.
 
−
 
−
:* Furthermore, it should be noted that the number of iterations needed per time step changes for different time steps and order of temporal discretization, so it is suggested that they are selected in such a way that convergence of the total vapor volume per time step is achieved.
 
−
 
−
:* A grid independent solution has been reached; even the coarsest mesh was capable of capturing the dynamic shedding in a high frequency after application of Reboud’s eddy viscosity correction.
 
−
 
−
:* As a second step, an effort to validate the model was made comparing the numerical results with experimental data. Good agreement was obtained and the shedding frequency was accurately predicted. Discrepancies can only be observed in the maximum total volume per cycle.
 
−
 
−
:* Further computations on a three-dimensional domain are recommended to investigate possible alterations on the cavitation dynamics and the shedding frequency.
 
−
 
−
:* It is finally recommended to investigate the possible erosion mechanisms and the capability of predicting the potentially erosive cavitation implosions using incompressible URANS solver.
 
  
 
==REFERENCES ==
 
==REFERENCES ==

Revision as of 18:20, 6 June 2017


VII International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering
MARINE 2017
M. Visonneau, P. Queutey and D. Le Touzé (Eds)
A NUMERICAL STUDY ON THE SHEDDING FREQUENCY OF SHEET CAVITATION


Abstract. The last decades there is a strong interest in predicting cavitation dynamics as it is a prerequisite in order to predict cavitation erosion. Industrial applications require accurate results in an acceptable time span and as a result there is a focus on large scale dynamics. In this paper the RANS equations are used to investigate the shedding frequency of sheet cavities in two-dimensional simulations. First a verification study is made for the NACA 0015 in 6 degrees angle of incidence. A grid sensitivity study is conducted in wetted flow and in steady (non-shedding) cavitating condition (σ=1.6). Then an investigation is conducted in order to capture the shedding frequency. The results show that only when a correction for turbulent viscosity at the cavity-water interface is used it was possible to capture the shedding frequency as found in other numerical studies. Furthermore, a validation study is conducted on a NACA66-312 α=0.8 for two different angles of attack. The obtained results are compared and validated with the experimental data from Leroux et al. They indicate that the 2D shedding frequency predicted by the numerical simulations is in good agreement with the frequency obtained in the experiment.

REFERENCES

[1] M. Bijlard and N. Bulten, "RANS simulations of cavitating azimuthing thrusters," in Fourth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Austin, Texas, USA, (2015).
[2] G. Bark, N. Berchiche and M. Grekula , "Application of principles for observation and analysis of eroding cavitation - The EROCAV observation handbook," Edition 3.1, (2004).
[3] R. Fortes-Patella, J. L. Reboud and L. Briancon-Marjollet, "A phenomenological and numerical model for scaling the flow aggressiveness in cavitation erosion," EROCAV Workshop, Val de Reuil, (2004).
[4] T. J. C. V. Terwisga, P. A. Fitzsimmons, Li Ziru and E. J. Foeth, "Cavitation Erosion - A review of physical mechanisms and erosion risk models," in Proceedings of 7th International Symposium on Cavitation, CAV2009, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, August 2009.
[5] F. Menter, "Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence modeling for engineering applications," AIAA Journal, vol. 32, pp. 1598-1605, (1994).
[6] J. L. Reboud and Y. Delannoy, "Two-phase flow modelling of unsteady cavitation," in 2nd Int. Symposium on Cavitation , Tokyo , (1994).
[7] J.-L. Reboud, B. Stutz and O. Coutier, "Two-phase flow structure of cavitation: experiment and modelling of unsteady effects," in Third International Symposium on Cavitation, Grenoble, France, (1998).
[8] European Comission Project FP6, http://www.virtual-basin.org/: Virtual Towing tank Utility in Europe, (2005-2008).
[9] L. Eca and M. Hoekstra, "A procedure for the estimation of the numerical uncertainty of CFD calculations based on grid refinement studies," Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 262, pp. 104-130, (2014).
[10] J.-B. Leroux, O. Coutier-Delgosha and J. A. Astolfi, "A joint experimental and numerical study of mechanisms associated to instability of partial cavitation on two-dimensional hydrofoil," Phys. Fluids 17, 052101, (2005).
[11] J.-B. Leroux, J. A. Astolfi and J. Y. Billard, "An Experimental Study of Unsteady Partial Cavitation," ASME J. Fluids Eng., vol. 126, pp. 94-101, (2004).
[12] Z. Li, M. Pourquie and T. Terwisga, "Assessment of Cavitation Erosion With a URANS Method," Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vols. 136, 041101, (2014).
[13] A. H. Koop, "Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Three-Dimensional Sheet Cavitation," Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, (2008).
[14] J. Sauer, "Instationär kavitierende strömungen - Ein neues modell, basierend auf fron capturing (VoF) und blasendynamik," Ph.D. Thesis, Karlsruhe University, Karlsruhe, Germany, (2000).
[15] G. H. Schnerr, S. J. Schmidt, I. H. Sezal and M. Thalhamer, "Shock and Wave Dynamics of Compressible Liquid Flows With Special Emphasis on Unsteady Load on Hydrofoils and Cavitation in Injection Nozzles," in Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on Cavitation, Wageningen, The Netherlands, (2006).
[16] A. Oprea, Prediction of Tip Vortex Cavitation for Ship Propellers, PhD Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands: Uitgeverij POXPress, (December 2013).
[17] M. Hoekstra and G. Vaz, "FreSCo Exercises for NACA0015 Foil," VIRTUE WP4 Workshop, Contribution from MARIN, (2008).
[18] Z. Li, Assessment of Cavitation Erosion with Multiphase Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Method. PhD Thesis, Technische Universiteit Delft, (2012).
[19] J.-P. Franc and J.-M. Michel, Fundamentals of Cavitation, volume 76, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, (2004).
Back to Top
GET EPUB

Document information

Published on 14/06/17
Submitted on 14/06/17

Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

4

Views 57
Recommendations 1

Share this document

Keywords

• • • •