m (Move page script moved page Meheut et al 1970a to Meheut et al 2022a) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This paper investigates benefits resulting from the use of coupled aeroelastic analysis for aerodynamic shape optimisation of a highly flexible wing. The study is carried out on the eXternal Research Forum model (XRF-1) specified by Airbus Commercial Aircraft, representative of a long-range aircraft configuration. Improvements delivered by considering aeroelastic effects for the evaluation of both the aerodynamic performance and the associated gradients are assessed with respect to the results obtained by freezing the wing flexibility in both primal and adjoint computations. An analysis of the impact on the different drag components is also illustrated based on the far-field drag breakdown. Results show that for induced drag, engaging flexibility only at the primal level still allows to capture first-order gain on the final performance. However, engaging coupled-adjoint sensitivities is key to completely master wave drag reduction on the considered highly flexible wing. Performance improvement obtained by increasing the number of design parameters is also investigated. | This paper investigates benefits resulting from the use of coupled aeroelastic analysis for aerodynamic shape optimisation of a highly flexible wing. The study is carried out on the eXternal Research Forum model (XRF-1) specified by Airbus Commercial Aircraft, representative of a long-range aircraft configuration. Improvements delivered by considering aeroelastic effects for the evaluation of both the aerodynamic performance and the associated gradients are assessed with respect to the results obtained by freezing the wing flexibility in both primal and adjoint computations. An analysis of the impact on the different drag components is also illustrated based on the far-field drag breakdown. Results show that for induced drag, engaging flexibility only at the primal level still allows to capture first-order gain on the final performance. However, engaging coupled-adjoint sensitivities is key to completely master wave drag reduction on the considered highly flexible wing. Performance improvement obtained by increasing the number of design parameters is also investigated. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Abstract == | ||
| + | <pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_6388820391665_abstract.pdf</pdf> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Full Paper == | ||
| + | <pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_6388820391665_paper.pdf</pdf> | ||
Latest revision as of 17:06, 25 November 2022
Summary
This paper investigates benefits resulting from the use of coupled aeroelastic analysis for aerodynamic shape optimisation of a highly flexible wing. The study is carried out on the eXternal Research Forum model (XRF-1) specified by Airbus Commercial Aircraft, representative of a long-range aircraft configuration. Improvements delivered by considering aeroelastic effects for the evaluation of both the aerodynamic performance and the associated gradients are assessed with respect to the results obtained by freezing the wing flexibility in both primal and adjoint computations. An analysis of the impact on the different drag components is also illustrated based on the far-field drag breakdown. Results show that for induced drag, engaging flexibility only at the primal level still allows to capture first-order gain on the final performance. However, engaging coupled-adjoint sensitivities is key to completely master wave drag reduction on the considered highly flexible wing. Performance improvement obtained by increasing the number of design parameters is also investigated.
Abstract
Full Paper
Document information
Published on 24/11/22
Accepted on 24/11/22
Submitted on 24/11/22
Volume Science Computing, 2022
DOI: 10.23967/eccomas.2022.040
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Share this document
Keywords
claim authorship
Are you one of the authors of this document?