(Created page with " == Abstract == We compare and evaluate how well-known and novel networkwide objective functions for Traffic Engineering (TE) algorithms fulfil TE requirements. To compare th...")
 
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 727284071 to Leduc et al 2006a)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 11:33, 25 January 2021

Abstract

We compare and evaluate how well-known and novel networkwide objective functions for Traffic Engineering (TE) algorithms fulfil TE requirements. To compare the objective functions we model the TE problem as a linear program and solve it to optimality, thus finding for each objective function the best possible target of any heuristic TE algorithm. We show that all the objective functions are not equivalent and some are far better than others. Considering the preferences a network operator may have, we show which objective functions are adequate or not. Peer reviewed


Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11753810_7 under the license http://www.springer.com/tdm
https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/networking/networking2006.html#BalonSL06,
http://wpage.unina.it/pescape/cit/new2511/Networking2006-Balon.pdf,
http://core.ac.uk/display/13475861,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11753810_7,
https://rd.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/11753810_7,
https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/3395,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1913894557
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2006

Volume 2006, 2006
DOI: 10.1007/11753810_7
Licence: Other

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?