(Created page with "==1 Title, abstract and keywords== Your paper should start with a concise and informative title. Titles are often used in information-retrieval systems. Avoid abbreviations a...") |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ==1 | + | ==Abstract== |
| + | The numerical simulation of complex dynamical systems is an important way for studying phenomena that are difficult to investigate experimentally. We could then speak about numerical granular media as a specific scientific field similarly to the numerical fluids twenty years ago. The numerical investigation progresses so quickly with respect with the experiments that the comparison between simulations and experiments is often rather coarse. Moreover the numerical tools may be used beyond their limits of validity. We propose to analyse the contributions, but also the limits of the NonSmooth Contact Dynamics (NSCD), developed by J.J. Moreau [<span id='cite-1'></span>[[#1|1]]], applied to the granular systems starting from some experiences and from the numerous remarks given by Moreau himself in his papers [<span id='cite-2'></span>[[#2|2]]]. | ||
| − | + | The NSCD method has been developed for dealing with large collections of packed bodies and then for simulating the behaviour of granular materials. The Nonlinear Gauss-Seidel (NLGS) algorithm is the generic solver applied to the NSCD formulation. This combination allows simulation of the behaviour of a collection of (especially rigid) bodies involving different and mixed regimes: static, slow dynamics (solid), fast dynamics (fluid). Some examples illustrate the ability of the Moreau’s approach for dealing with a large range of granular problems. | |
| − | + | For illustrating the limits of the NSCD approach we focus our attention on dense granular systems that are strongly confined. In order to respect the “elegant rusticity” of the Moreau’s approach we restrict the analysis to a collection of rigid bodies without considering global or local deformations of the grains. Some simple examples highlight the issue of inconsistencies, i.e. some configurations for which no solution exists, as well as indeterminacies, i.e. configurations that lead to non-uniqueness of solutions. We recover here the Painlevé paradox underlined at the beginning of the twentieth century. The non existence of solutions is the more important challenge we have to face. We can first identify the situations leading to this non existence among them the granular systems submitted to moving walls. If such a case may not be avoided another response consists in changing the Coulomb friction law. | |
| − | + | The NSCD approach is well adapted to inelastic shocks that predominate in granular media. However J.J. Moreau introduced the concept of formal velocity to account for an elastic restitution. This concept is richer than a restitution coefficient (Newton or Poisson type) involving a binary shock; this permits to deal with multicontact situations without introducing either deformable grains or elastic-plastic contact laws [<span id='cite-3'></span>[[#3|3]]]. However this does not allow to reproduce shock propagation as it occurs for instance in the famous Newton’s cradle. Is it then possible to propose an algorithmic solution in the NSCD framework? | |
| − | == | + | == Recording of the presentation == |
| − | + | {| style="font-size:120%; color: #222222; border: 1px solid darkgray; background: #f3f3f3; table-layout: fixed; width:100%;" | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | | {{#evt:service=youtube|id=https://youtu.be/1t-U3J6mahU | alignment=center}} | |
| − | + | |- style="text-align: center;" | |
| − | + | | Location: Technical University of Catalonia (UPC), Vertex Building. | |
| − | + | |- style="text-align: center;" | |
| − | + | | Date: 28 - 30 September 2015, Barcelona, Spain. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | {| style=" | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | |- | + | |
| − | | | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | |
| − | | style="text-align: center;"| | + | |
| − | |- | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | |
|} | |} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | == General Information == | |
| + | * Location: Technical University of Catalonia (UPC), Barcelona, Spain. | ||
| + | * Date: 28 - 30 September 2015 | ||
| + | * Secretariat: [//www.cimne.com/ International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE)]. | ||
| − | + | == External Links == | |
| − | + | * [//congress.cimne.com/particles2015/frontal/default.asp Particles 2015] Official Website of the Conference. | |
| − | [ | + | * [//www.cimnemultimediachannel.com/ CIMNE Multimedia Channel] |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ==References== | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
<div id="1"></div> | <div id="1"></div> | ||
| − | [[#cite-1|[1]]] | + | [[#cite-1|[1]]] J.J. Moreau, “Numerical aspects of the sweeping process”, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng., |
| − | + | 177, Issues 3-4, 329–349 (1999). | |
<div id="2"></div> | <div id="2"></div> | ||
| − | [[#cite-2|[2]]] | + | [[#cite-2|[2]]] J.J. Moreau, “Facing to the plurality of solutions in nonsmooth mechanics”, in |
| − | + | Nosmooth/Nonconvex mechanics with applications in Engineering, Editions Ziti, | |
| + | Thessaloniki,3-12 (2006) | ||
<div id="3"></div> | <div id="3"></div> | ||
| − | [[#cite-3|[3]]] | + | [[#cite-3|[3]]] N.S. Nguyen, B. Brogliato, Multiple impacts in dissipative granular chains, Springer, (2014) |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
Latest revision as of 12:09, 20 July 2016
Abstract
The numerical simulation of complex dynamical systems is an important way for studying phenomena that are difficult to investigate experimentally. We could then speak about numerical granular media as a specific scientific field similarly to the numerical fluids twenty years ago. The numerical investigation progresses so quickly with respect with the experiments that the comparison between simulations and experiments is often rather coarse. Moreover the numerical tools may be used beyond their limits of validity. We propose to analyse the contributions, but also the limits of the NonSmooth Contact Dynamics (NSCD), developed by J.J. Moreau [1], applied to the granular systems starting from some experiences and from the numerous remarks given by Moreau himself in his papers [2].
The NSCD method has been developed for dealing with large collections of packed bodies and then for simulating the behaviour of granular materials. The Nonlinear Gauss-Seidel (NLGS) algorithm is the generic solver applied to the NSCD formulation. This combination allows simulation of the behaviour of a collection of (especially rigid) bodies involving different and mixed regimes: static, slow dynamics (solid), fast dynamics (fluid). Some examples illustrate the ability of the Moreau’s approach for dealing with a large range of granular problems.
For illustrating the limits of the NSCD approach we focus our attention on dense granular systems that are strongly confined. In order to respect the “elegant rusticity” of the Moreau’s approach we restrict the analysis to a collection of rigid bodies without considering global or local deformations of the grains. Some simple examples highlight the issue of inconsistencies, i.e. some configurations for which no solution exists, as well as indeterminacies, i.e. configurations that lead to non-uniqueness of solutions. We recover here the Painlevé paradox underlined at the beginning of the twentieth century. The non existence of solutions is the more important challenge we have to face. We can first identify the situations leading to this non existence among them the granular systems submitted to moving walls. If such a case may not be avoided another response consists in changing the Coulomb friction law.
The NSCD approach is well adapted to inelastic shocks that predominate in granular media. However J.J. Moreau introduced the concept of formal velocity to account for an elastic restitution. This concept is richer than a restitution coefficient (Newton or Poisson type) involving a binary shock; this permits to deal with multicontact situations without introducing either deformable grains or elastic-plastic contact laws [3]. However this does not allow to reproduce shock propagation as it occurs for instance in the famous Newton’s cradle. Is it then possible to propose an algorithmic solution in the NSCD framework?
Recording of the presentation
| Location: Technical University of Catalonia (UPC), Vertex Building. |
| Date: 28 - 30 September 2015, Barcelona, Spain. |
General Information
- Location: Technical University of Catalonia (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
- Date: 28 - 30 September 2015
- Secretariat: International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE).
External Links
- Particles 2015 Official Website of the Conference.
- CIMNE Multimedia Channel
References
[1] J.J. Moreau, “Numerical aspects of the sweeping process”, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng., 177, Issues 3-4, 329–349 (1999).
[2] J.J. Moreau, “Facing to the plurality of solutions in nonsmooth mechanics”, in Nosmooth/Nonconvex mechanics with applications in Engineering, Editions Ziti, Thessaloniki,3-12 (2006)
[3] N.S. Nguyen, B. Brogliato, Multiple impacts in dissipative granular chains, Springer, (2014)
Back to Top
Document information
Published on 29/06/16
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Share this document
claim authorship
Are you one of the authors of this document?