(Created page with " == Abstract == This chapter discusses how the UK planning system and local planning practice have responded to the ethnic, cultural, religious and demographic diversificatio...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Abstract == | == Abstract == | ||
| − | This chapter discusses how the UK planning system and local planning practice have responded to the ethnic, cultural, religious and demographic diversification of British society generated by 20th- and 21st-century waves of migration. Planning theorists and practitioners have advocated new forms of | + | This chapter discusses how the UK planning system and local planning practice have responded to the ethnic, cultural, religious and demographic diversification of British society generated by 20th- and 21st-century waves of migration. Planning theorists and practitioners have advocated new forms of âplanning for diversityâ since the 1980s, driven by a politics of recognition of difference. Such concerns have first been addressed through national legislative anti-discrimination and equality provisions. Local planning authorities have encouraged the participation of ethnic minority groups in planning processes and sought to address their specific needs, through both minority-targeted policies and area-based urban policies. Planners have also played a role in creating spaces of (multicultural) encounter. The chapter concludes by contrasting normative calls for âplanning for diversityâ with the ambiguities, contradictory outcomes, dilemmas and challenges of doing so in practice. |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| Line 18: | Line 13: | ||
* [https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10060359/1/ColombRaco%20Chapter_v31.10.2017%20FINAL%20with%20ref_OA.pdf https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10060359/1/ColombRaco%20Chapter_v31.10.2017%20FINAL%20with%20ref_OA.pdf] | * [https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10060359/1/ColombRaco%20Chapter_v31.10.2017%20FINAL%20with%20ref_OA.pdf https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10060359/1/ColombRaco%20Chapter_v31.10.2017%20FINAL%20with%20ref_OA.pdf] | ||
| − | * [https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10060359 https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10060359],[https:// | + | * [https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10060359 https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10060359], |
| + | : [https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10060359/1/ColombRaco%20Chapter_v31.10.2017%20FINAL%20with%20ref_OA.pdf https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10060359/1/ColombRaco%20Chapter_v31.10.2017%20FINAL%20with%20ref_OA.pdf] | ||
| − | * [https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10060359 https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10060359],[https:// | + | * [https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10060359 https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10060359], |
| + | : [https://www.scipedia.com/public/Colomb_Raco_2018a https://www.scipedia.com/public/Colomb_Raco_2018a], | ||
| + | : [https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781351203319/chapters/10.4324/9781351203319-11 https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781351203319/chapters/10.4324/9781351203319-11], | ||
| + | : [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2903577454 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2903577454] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:48, 21 January 2021
Abstract
This chapter discusses how the UK planning system and local planning practice have responded to the ethnic, cultural, religious and demographic diversification of British society generated by 20th- and 21st-century waves of migration. Planning theorists and practitioners have advocated new forms of âplanning for diversityâ since the 1980s, driven by a politics of recognition of difference. Such concerns have first been addressed through national legislative anti-discrimination and equality provisions. Local planning authorities have encouraged the participation of ethnic minority groups in planning processes and sought to address their specific needs, through both minority-targeted policies and area-based urban policies. Planners have also played a role in creating spaces of (multicultural) encounter. The chapter concludes by contrasting normative calls for âplanning for diversityâ with the ambiguities, contradictory outcomes, dilemmas and challenges of doing so in practice.
Original document
The different versions of the original document can be found in:
Document information
Published on 01/01/2018
Volume 2018, 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781351203319-11
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Share this document
Keywords
claim authorship
Are you one of the authors of this document?