Latest revision as of 12:45, 16 February 2021

Abstract

Due to their disproportional representation in fatal crashes, younger and older drivers both stand to benefit from in-vehicle safety technologies, yet little is known about how they value such technologies, or their willingness to adopt them. The current study investigated older (aged 65 and greater; N = 49) and younger (ages 18-23; N = 40) adults’ valuation of a blind spot monitor and asked if self-reported visual difficulties while driving predicted the amount participants were willing to pay for a particular system (BMW's Active Blind Spot Detection System) that was demonstrated using a short video. Large and small anchor values ($250 and $500, respectively) were used as between subjects manipulations to examine the effects of initial valuation, and participants proceeded through a short staircase procedure that offered them either the free installation of the system on their current vehicle or a monetary prize ($25-$950) that changed in value according to which option they had selected in the previous step of the staircase procedure. Willingness to use other advanced driver assistance systems (lane-departure warning, automatic lane centering, emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, and self-parking systems) was also analyzed, additionally controlling for prior familiarity of those systems. Results showed that increased age was associated with a higher valuation for the Active Blind Spot Detection System in both the large and small anchor value conditions controlling for income, gender, and technology self-efficacy. Older adults valued blind spot detection about twice as much ($762) as younger adults ($383) in the large anchor condition, though both groups’ values were in the range for the current cost of an aftermarket system. Similarly, age was the most robust positive predictor of willingness to adopt other driving technologies, along with system familiarity. Difficulties with driving-related visual factors also positively predicting acceptance levels for adaptive cruise control and emergency braking systems. Results are discussed in comparison to older adults’ willingness to pay for other home-based assistive technologies aimed at improving well-being and independence.

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

• http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc5325821?pdf=render

• https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5325821

• https://www.zora.uzh.ch/145704

• https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0001457516303062?httpAccept=text/xml,

https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0001457516303062?httpAccept=text/plain,

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.020 under the license https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

• https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457516303062,

https://core.ac.uk/display/154257462,

https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/145704,

https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2515374531