(Created page with " == Abstract == The 100-F-46 french drain consisted of a 1.5 to 3 m long, vertically buried, gravel-filled pipe that was approximately 1 m in diameter. Also included in this...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The 100-F-46 french drain consisted of a 1.5 to 3 m long, vertically buried, gravel-filled pipe that was approximately 1 m in diameter. Also included in this waste site was a 5 cm cast-iron pipeline that drained condensate from the 119-F Stack Sampling Building into the 100-F-46 french drain. In accordance with this evaluation, the confirmatory sampling results support a reclassification of this site to No Action. The current site conditions achieve the remedial action objectives and the corresponding remedial action goals established in the Remaining Sites ROD. The results of confirmatory sampling show that residual contaminant concentrations do not preclude any future uses and allow for unrestricted use of shallow zone soils. The results also demonstrate that residual contaminant concentrations are protective of groundwater and the Columbia River. | The 100-F-46 french drain consisted of a 1.5 to 3 m long, vertically buried, gravel-filled pipe that was approximately 1 m in diameter. Also included in this waste site was a 5 cm cast-iron pipeline that drained condensate from the 119-F Stack Sampling Building into the 100-F-46 french drain. In accordance with this evaluation, the confirmatory sampling results support a reclassification of this site to No Action. The current site conditions achieve the remedial action objectives and the corresponding remedial action goals established in the Remaining Sites ROD. The results of confirmatory sampling show that residual contaminant concentrations do not preclude any future uses and allow for unrestricted use of shallow zone soils. The results also demonstrate that residual contaminant concentrations are protective of groundwater and the Columbia River. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| Line 18: | Line 13: | ||
* [https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc898077/m2/1/high_res_d/944168.pdf https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc898077/m2/1/high_res_d/944168.pdf] | * [https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc898077/m2/1/high_res_d/944168.pdf https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc898077/m2/1/high_res_d/944168.pdf] | ||
| − | * [https://core.ac.uk/display/71318362 https://core.ac.uk/display/71318362],[https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc898077/m2/1/high_res_d/944168.pdf https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc898077/m2/1/high_res_d/944168.pdf],[https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/247409225 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/247409225] | + | * [https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/944168 https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/944168], |
| + | : [https://core.ac.uk/display/71318362 https://core.ac.uk/display/71318362], | ||
| + | : [https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc898077/m2/1/high_res_d/944168.pdf https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc898077/m2/1/high_res_d/944168.pdf], | ||
| + | : [https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc898077 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc898077], | ||
| + | : [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/247409225 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/247409225] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:40, 22 January 2021
Abstract
The 100-F-46 french drain consisted of a 1.5 to 3 m long, vertically buried, gravel-filled pipe that was approximately 1 m in diameter. Also included in this waste site was a 5 cm cast-iron pipeline that drained condensate from the 119-F Stack Sampling Building into the 100-F-46 french drain. In accordance with this evaluation, the confirmatory sampling results support a reclassification of this site to No Action. The current site conditions achieve the remedial action objectives and the corresponding remedial action goals established in the Remaining Sites ROD. The results of confirmatory sampling show that residual contaminant concentrations do not preclude any future uses and allow for unrestricted use of shallow zone soils. The results also demonstrate that residual contaminant concentrations are protective of groundwater and the Columbia River.
Original document
The different versions of the original document can be found in:
Document information
Published on 01/01/2008
Volume 2008, 2008
DOI: 10.2172/944168
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Share this document
Keywords
claim authorship
Are you one of the authors of this document?