(Created page with " == Abstract == We analyse the possible consequences of activating iBGP multipath load sharing in a given domain (or AS), which allows for load balancing over multiple exit r...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Abstract == | == Abstract == | ||
| − | We analyse the possible consequences of activating iBGP multipath load sharing in a given domain (or AS), which allows for load balancing over multiple exit routers. It has been stated that interdomain routing loops may appear in this case. We show that under reasonable assumptions (which reflect commercial relationships between ASes) such routing loops cannot appear. Furthermore we show that even if theses assumptions are not met, routing loops can only be transient. | + | We analyse the possible consequences of activating iBGP multipath load sharing in a given domain (or AS), which allows for load balancing over multiple exit routers. It has been stated that interdomain routing loops may appear in this case. We show that under reasonable assumptions (which reflect commercial relationships between ASes) such routing loops cannot appear. Furthermore we show that even if theses assumptions are not met, routing loops can only be transient. Peer reviewed |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| Line 16: | Line 11: | ||
* [https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/3334/2/SB-aintec07-pre.pdf https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/3334/2/SB-aintec07-pre.pdf] | * [https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/3334/2/SB-aintec07-pre.pdf https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/3334/2/SB-aintec07-pre.pdf] | ||
| + | * [https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/3334 https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/3334] | ||
| + | * [http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/978-3-540-76809-8_19 http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/978-3-540-76809-8_19], | ||
| + | : [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76809-8_19 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76809-8_19] | ||
| − | + | * [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-76809-8_19 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-76809-8_19], | |
| + | : [https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/3334 https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/3334], | ||
| + | : [http://orbi.ulg.ac.be/handle/2268/3334 http://orbi.ulg.ac.be/handle/2268/3334], | ||
| + | : [https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/aintec/aintec2007.html#BalonL07 https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/aintec/aintec2007.html#BalonL07], | ||
| + | : [https://www.scipedia.com/public/Balon_Leduc_2007a https://www.scipedia.com/public/Balon_Leduc_2007a], | ||
| + | : [https://rd.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-76809-8_19 https://rd.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-76809-8_19], | ||
| + | : [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2168499537 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2168499537] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:20, 21 January 2021
Abstract
We analyse the possible consequences of activating iBGP multipath load sharing in a given domain (or AS), which allows for load balancing over multiple exit routers. It has been stated that interdomain routing loops may appear in this case. We show that under reasonable assumptions (which reflect commercial relationships between ASes) such routing loops cannot appear. Furthermore we show that even if theses assumptions are not met, routing loops can only be transient. Peer reviewed
Original document
The different versions of the original document can be found in:
- https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/3334,
- http://orbi.ulg.ac.be/handle/2268/3334,
- https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/aintec/aintec2007.html#BalonL07,
- https://www.scipedia.com/public/Balon_Leduc_2007a,
- https://rd.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-76809-8_19,
- https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2168499537
Back to Top
Document information
Published on 01/01/2007
Volume 2007, 2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-76809-8_19
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Share this document
Keywords
claim authorship
Are you one of the authors of this document?