m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 192157485 to Agapaki Brilakis 2018a)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
90% of the time needed for the conversion from point clouds to 3D models of industrial facilities is spent on geometric modelling due to the sheer number of Industrial Objects (IOs) of each plant. Hence, cost reduction is only possible by automating modelling. Our previous work has successfully identified the most frequent industrial objects which are in descending order: electrical conduit, straight pipes, circular hollow sections, elbows, channels, solid bars, I-beams, angles, flanges and valves. We modelled those on a state-of-theart software, EdgeWise and then evaluated the performance of this software for pipeline and structural modelling. The modelling of pipelines is summarized in three basic steps: (a) automated extraction of cylinders, (b) their semantic classification and (c) manual extraction and editing of pipes. The results showed that cylinders are modelled with 75 % recall and 62 % precision on average. We discovered that pipes, electrical conduit and circular hollow sections require 80 % of the Total Modelling Hours (TMH) of the 10 most frequent IOs to build the plant model. TMH was then compared to modelling hours in Revit and showed that 67 % of pipe modelling time is saved by EdgeWise. This paper is the first to evaluate state-of-the-art industrial modelling software. These findings help in better understanding the problem and serve as the foundation for researchers who are interested in solving i
 
90% of the time needed for the conversion from point clouds to 3D models of industrial facilities is spent on geometric modelling due to the sheer number of Industrial Objects (IOs) of each plant. Hence, cost reduction is only possible by automating modelling. Our previous work has successfully identified the most frequent industrial objects which are in descending order: electrical conduit, straight pipes, circular hollow sections, elbows, channels, solid bars, I-beams, angles, flanges and valves. We modelled those on a state-of-theart software, EdgeWise and then evaluated the performance of this software for pipeline and structural modelling. The modelling of pipelines is summarized in three basic steps: (a) automated extraction of cylinders, (b) their semantic classification and (c) manual extraction and editing of pipes. The results showed that cylinders are modelled with 75 % recall and 62 % precision on average. We discovered that pipes, electrical conduit and circular hollow sections require 80 % of the Total Modelling Hours (TMH) of the 10 most frequent IOs to build the plant model. TMH was then compared to modelling hours in Revit and showed that 67 % of pipe modelling time is saved by EdgeWise. This paper is the first to evaluate state-of-the-art industrial modelling software. These findings help in better understanding the problem and serve as the foundation for researchers who are interested in solving i
 
Document type: Part of book or chapter of book
 
 
== Full document ==
 
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_192157485-beopen944-4049-document.pdf</pdf>
 
  
  
Line 17: Line 12:
  
 
* [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/1810/279173/1/EG-ICE2018_012_final_v4.pdf https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/1810/279173/1/EG-ICE2018_012_final_v4.pdf]
 
* [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/1810/279173/1/EG-ICE2018_012_final_v4.pdf https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/1810/279173/1/EG-ICE2018_012_final_v4.pdf]
 +
 +
* [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/279173 https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/279173]
 +
 +
* [http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-91635-4_6 http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-91635-4_6],
 +
: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91635-4_6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91635-4_6] under the license http://www.springer.com/tdm
 +
 +
* [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-91635-4_6 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-91635-4_6],
 +
: [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/279173 https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/279173],
 +
: [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91635-4_6 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91635-4_6],
 +
: [https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/egice/egice2018-1.html#AgapakiB18 https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/egice/egice2018-1.html#AgapakiB18],
 +
: [http://publications.eng.cam.ac.uk/979696 http://publications.eng.cam.ac.uk/979696],
 +
: [https://rd.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-91635-4_6 https://rd.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-91635-4_6],
 +
: [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2803271030 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2803271030]
  
  
  
DOIS: 10.17863/CAM.26553 10.1007/978-3-319-91635-4_6
+
DOIS: 10.17863/cam.26553 10.1007/978-3-319-91635-4_6

Latest revision as of 17:31, 21 January 2021

Abstract

90% of the time needed for the conversion from point clouds to 3D models of industrial facilities is spent on geometric modelling due to the sheer number of Industrial Objects (IOs) of each plant. Hence, cost reduction is only possible by automating modelling. Our previous work has successfully identified the most frequent industrial objects which are in descending order: electrical conduit, straight pipes, circular hollow sections, elbows, channels, solid bars, I-beams, angles, flanges and valves. We modelled those on a state-of-theart software, EdgeWise and then evaluated the performance of this software for pipeline and structural modelling. The modelling of pipelines is summarized in three basic steps: (a) automated extraction of cylinders, (b) their semantic classification and (c) manual extraction and editing of pipes. The results showed that cylinders are modelled with 75 % recall and 62 % precision on average. We discovered that pipes, electrical conduit and circular hollow sections require 80 % of the Total Modelling Hours (TMH) of the 10 most frequent IOs to build the plant model. TMH was then compared to modelling hours in Revit and showed that 67 % of pipe modelling time is saved by EdgeWise. This paper is the first to evaluate state-of-the-art industrial modelling software. These findings help in better understanding the problem and serve as the foundation for researchers who are interested in solving i


Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91635-4_6 under the license http://www.springer.com/tdm
https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/279173,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91635-4_6,
https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/egice/egice2018-1.html#AgapakiB18,
http://publications.eng.cam.ac.uk/979696,
https://rd.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-91635-4_6,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2803271030


DOIS: 10.17863/cam.26553 10.1007/978-3-319-91635-4_6

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2018

Volume 2018, 2018
DOI: 10.17863/CAM.26553
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 2
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?