(Created page with " == Abstract == <p>The integration of renewable energy sources (RES) into electrical power systems introduces critical challenges to grid stability, including frequency devia...")
 
m (Scipediacontent moved page Review 330472797295 to Merabet et al 2026a)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
== Abstract ==
 
== Abstract ==
  
<p>The integration of renewable energy sources (RES) into electrical power systems introduces critical challenges to grid stability, including frequency deviation, voltage fluctuation, and reduced transient performance. This study investigates the impact of increasing RES penetration (15%, 30%, 45%, and 60%) on grid stability using the IEEE 39-bus benchmark system. A coordinated mitigation framework integrating battery energy storage systems (BESS), synthetic inertia, and advanced inverter-based controls is proposed and evaluated. Simulation results demonstrate that at 60% RES penetration without mitigation, the frequency nadir declines to 49.32 Hz, the rate of change of frequency (RoCoF) increases to 1.82 Hz/s, voltage deviations exceed 9.3%, and the critical clearing time (CCT) reduces to 180 ms, indicating significant stability deterioration. The proposed mitigation strategy improves these metrics to 49.76 Hz, 0.94 Hz/s, 4.6%, and 260 ms, respectively, representing improvements of+0.44 Hz, &ndash;48.4%, &ndash;50.5%, and+44.4%. Benchmarking against recent literature confirms the superior performance of the coordinated approach. These findings provide quantitative guidance for grid planners and operators to maintain reliable operation under high renewable penetration scenarios.OPEN ACCESS Received: 19/01/2026 Accepted: 28/02/2026</p>
+
<p>This study presents a hybrid modelling framework for predicting
 
+
river water temperature (Tw) by combining advanced boosting
 
+
algorithms with signal decomposition techniques. Four models
 +
were compared: (i) categorical boosting (CatBoost), (ii) extreme
 +
gradient boosting (XGBoost), (iii) adaptive boosting (AdaBoost),
 +
and (iv) light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM). Each model
 +
was developed using air temperature (Ta) as input, both with
 +
and without signal decomposition. Three algorithms, empirical
 +
mode decomposition (EMD), ensemble EMD (EEMD), and
 +
complete EEMD with adaptive noise (CEEMDAN), were applied
 +
to decompose Ta into intrinsic mode functions (IMFs), which
 +
served as additional predictors. The models were trained and
 +
validated using data from four Polish river stations, and their
 +
performance was evaluated using root mean squared error
 +
(RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), correlation coefficient
 +
(R), and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE). Tw was modelled as an
 +
instantaneous function of Ta, without incorporating a forecasting
 +
horizon, to assess the ability of decomposition-boosting hybrids
 +
to reproduce observed thermal dynamics at the same time step
 +
rather than perform multi-step predictions. Unlike previous
 +
single-hybrid studies, this work systematically compares multiple boosting-decomposition combinations under identical settings, isolating
 +
the decomposition effect and assessing accuracy, efficiency, and
 +
robustness. Results show that integrating signal decomposition substantially
 +
improves prediction accuracy. The best performance was
 +
achieved by XGBoost_EEMD (RMSE = 0.804, MAE = 0.598, R
 +
= 0.993, NSE = 0.987), reflecting a ∼64% improvement over the
 +
standalone model. The proposed hybrid modelling framework offers
 +
methodological innovation and practical potential for real-time, datadriven
 +
river temperature prediction in support of climate-resilient water
 +
management.</p>
  
 
== Document ==
 
== Document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_content_618535786-5538-document.pdf</pdf>
+
<pdf>Media:Review_330472797295_8664_144. TSP_RIMNI_78336.pdf</pdf>

Latest revision as of 12:42, 25 August 2026

Abstract

This study presents a hybrid modelling framework for predicting river water temperature (Tw) by combining advanced boosting algorithms with signal decomposition techniques. Four models were compared: (i) categorical boosting (CatBoost), (ii) extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), (iii) adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), and (iv) light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM). Each model was developed using air temperature (Ta) as input, both with and without signal decomposition. Three algorithms, empirical mode decomposition (EMD), ensemble EMD (EEMD), and complete EEMD with adaptive noise (CEEMDAN), were applied to decompose Ta into intrinsic mode functions (IMFs), which served as additional predictors. The models were trained and validated using data from four Polish river stations, and their performance was evaluated using root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), correlation coefficient (R), and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE). Tw was modelled as an instantaneous function of Ta, without incorporating a forecasting horizon, to assess the ability of decomposition-boosting hybrids to reproduce observed thermal dynamics at the same time step rather than perform multi-step predictions. Unlike previous single-hybrid studies, this work systematically compares multiple boosting-decomposition combinations under identical settings, isolating the decomposition effect and assessing accuracy, efficiency, and robustness. Results show that integrating signal decomposition substantially improves prediction accuracy. The best performance was achieved by XGBoost_EEMD (RMSE = 0.804, MAE = 0.598, R = 0.993, NSE = 0.987), reflecting a ∼64% improvement over the standalone model. The proposed hybrid modelling framework offers methodological innovation and practical potential for real-time, datadriven river temperature prediction in support of climate-resilient water management.

Document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document
Back to Top
GET PDF

Document information

Published on 07/08/26
Accepted on 12/02/26
Submitted on 29/12/25

Volume 42, Issue 6, 2026
DOI: 10.23967/j.rimni.2026.10.78336
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 5
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?