Latest revision as of 10:57, 27 November 2025

Abstract

Landslides triggered by earthquakes are large in scale and wide in scope, making them one of the most serious geological disasters. Earthquake landslide hazard assessment has become an important part of disaster reduction and prevention work. Based on existing research and assessment practices, such an assessment is divided into two levels: individual landslide assessment and regional landslide assessment. The individual assessment, mainly required by specific engineering seismic issues, serves as the foundation of earthquake landslide hazard assessment. It includes two analysis methods: qualitative analysis based on causal relationships (e.g., comprehensive indicator modeling, logistic regression, neural network modeling, information quantity evaluation) and mechanical analysis based on physical-mechanical mechanisms (e.g., quasi-static method, Newmark method, dynamic time-history method). This paper summarizes the characteristics and problems of these two methods. Regional assessment caters to regional strong earthquake geological disaster rescue deployment, future earthquake defense planning, and engineering construction strategic layout. It has two strategies—“from region to individual” (earthquake-focused, coarse-to-fine) and “from individual to region” (landslide-focused, point-to-area)—which differ in observation angles and technical routes. Currently, the individual assessment can estimate landslide hazard probability by considering potential seismic source ori-entations, but the regional assessment lags, e.g., ignoring such orientations and lacking the application of the dynamic time-history method. Thus, this paper proposes establishing slope seismic resistance fields and multi-azimuth seismic impact fields, then overlaying them to determine regional earth-quake landslide distribution probability, and points out future research directions.

Document