(Created blank page) |
m (JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 783028170 to Suto* 2024a) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Abstract== | ||
| + | The N-value by the standard penetration test (SPT) is commonly used for site characterisation in geotechnical engineering. S-wave velocity, typically estimated by borehole measurement or seismic survey, is also indicative of the strength of the ground. Many researchers attempted to find precise relationships between these parameters. However, N-values estimated from S-wave velocity using these formulae are subject to substantial errors, and the errors are inevitable due to the different nature of the parameters. The formula for pseudo-N value was first proposed in 2011 as (Suto, 2011). This is a simplified formula derived from the formulae found by the previous authors. By using this simple formula as a common practice, with understanding of existence of error, the results can be compared from site to site. This presentation first compares the N-value and S-wave velocity in their natures, methods, practice and cost. Then it examines the previously published formulae and proposed formula of pseudo-N value. Some examples of use of the pseudo-N values are also presented at the end. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Full Paper == | ||
| + | <pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_783028170163.pdf</pdf> | ||
The N-value by the standard penetration test (SPT) is commonly used for site characterisation in geotechnical engineering. S-wave velocity, typically estimated by borehole measurement or seismic survey, is also indicative of the strength of the ground. Many researchers attempted to find precise relationships between these parameters. However, N-values estimated from S-wave velocity using these formulae are subject to substantial errors, and the errors are inevitable due to the different nature of the parameters. The formula for pseudo-N value was first proposed in 2011 as (Suto, 2011). This is a simplified formula derived from the formulae found by the previous authors. By using this simple formula as a common practice, with understanding of existence of error, the results can be compared from site to site. This presentation first compares the N-value and S-wave velocity in their natures, methods, practice and cost. Then it examines the previously published formulae and proposed formula of pseudo-N value. Some examples of use of the pseudo-N values are also presented at the end.
Published on 07/06/24
Submitted on 07/06/24
Volume From measurement to reliable in situ geotechnical site characterization – statistical data processing, 2024
DOI: 10.23967/isc.2024.163
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?