Latest revision as of 12:53, 15 February 2022

Abstract

Discrete element method has been proved to be an effective method in predicting quantitatively the constitutive response of soils, even in the case of complex loadings (with rotation of principal stress directions, or loading/unloading cycles) where conventional elastoplastic constitutive relations may fail to simulate realistic responses [10]. For granular soils with a narrow grading, a direct representation of soil grains by polyhedral particles or with the level set method is possible [5], whereas for finer soils, or soils with a wider grading, alternative solutions should be considered. Spherical particles with enriched contact laws (e.g. by introducing rolling resistance at the contact) or rather simplified clumps of spheres can be used. This study aims to compare such different approaches. This comparison is done in terms of the prediction abilities at the macroscopic scale of the constitutive responses of soils, in particular for complex loading paths. Two kinds of discrete models are considered: (i) spherical particles with a rolling resistance, (ii) simple clumps made of 2 to 6 spheres. The models are calibrated from two drained triaxial compressions on dense and loose Hostun sand samples. They are then assessed, according to the macroscopic response, on loading paths strongly different from the calibration loading paths (isochoric compressions, circular stress paths in the deviatoric strain plane, constant deviatoric stress path, . . . ). The objective is to produce an optimized discrete element model in terms of prediction ability with respect to the computational cost, able to represent natural soils with possibly a wide particle size distribution, in order to tackle boundary value problems (as geotechnical structures) subjected to complex loadings.

Video

Abstract

Full paper