m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 279802526 to Borchert et al 2013a)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
Surprisingly little is known about policies that affect international trade in services. Previous analyses have focused on policy commitments made by countries in international agreements but these commitments do not in many cases reflect actual policy. This paper describes a new initiative to collect comparable information on services trade policies for 103 countries, across a range of service sectors and the relevant modes of service delivery. The resultant database reveals interesting patterns in policy. Across regions, some of the fastest growing countries in Asia and the oil-rich Gulf states have the most restrictive policies in services, whereas some of the poorest countries are remarkably open. Across sectors, professional and transportation services are among the most protected in both industrial and developing countries, while retail, telecommunications and even finance tend to be more open. An illustrative set of results suggests that trade policies matter for investment flows and access to services. In particular, restrictions on foreign acquisitions, discrimination in licensing, restrictions on the repatriation of earnings and lack of legal recourse all have a significant and sizable negative effect, reducing the expected value of sectoral foreign investment by $2.2 billion over a 7-year period, compared with"open"policy regimes. In terms of access to services, credit as a share of gross domestic product is on average 3.3 percentage points lower in countries with major restrictions on the establishment of foreign banks as compared with those that only impose operational restrictions.
 
Surprisingly little is known about policies that affect international trade in services. Previous analyses have focused on policy commitments made by countries in international agreements but these commitments do not in many cases reflect actual policy. This paper describes a new initiative to collect comparable information on services trade policies for 103 countries, across a range of service sectors and the relevant modes of service delivery. The resultant database reveals interesting patterns in policy. Across regions, some of the fastest growing countries in Asia and the oil-rich Gulf states have the most restrictive policies in services, whereas some of the poorest countries are remarkably open. Across sectors, professional and transportation services are among the most protected in both industrial and developing countries, while retail, telecommunications and even finance tend to be more open. An illustrative set of results suggests that trade policies matter for investment flows and access to services. In particular, restrictions on foreign acquisitions, discrimination in licensing, restrictions on the repatriation of earnings and lack of legal recourse all have a significant and sizable negative effect, reducing the expected value of sectoral foreign investment by $2.2 billion over a 7-year period, compared with"open"policy regimes. In terms of access to services, credit as a share of gross domestic product is on average 3.3 percentage points lower in countries with major restrictions on the establishment of foreign banks as compared with those that only impose operational restrictions.
  
Document type: Book
+
Document type: Preprint
  
 
== Full document ==
 
== Full document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_279802526-beopen699-2473-document.pdf</pdf>
+
<pdf>Media:Borchert_et_al_2013a-beopen1825-5088-document.pdf</pdf>
  
  
Line 25: Line 25:
  
 
* [https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/10986/22561/1/wber_28_1_162.pdf https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/10986/22561/1/wber_28_1_162.pdf] under the license cc-by-nc-nd
 
* [https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/10986/22561/1/wber_28_1_162.pdf https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/10986/22561/1/wber_28_1_162.pdf] under the license cc-by-nc-nd
 +
 +
* [http://academic.oup.com/wber/article-pdf/28/1/162/23944894/lht017.pdf http://academic.oup.com/wber/article-pdf/28/1/162/23944894/lht017.pdf],
 +
: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/wber/lht017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/wber/lht017]
 +
 +
* [http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/277401468331247210/Policy-barriers-to-international-trade-in-services-evidence-from-a-new-database http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/277401468331247210/Policy-barriers-to-international-trade-in-services-evidence-from-a-new-database],
 +
: [https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.1093/wber/lht017 https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.1093/wber/lht017],
 +
: [https://academic.oup.com/wber/article-abstract/28/1/162/1678056 https://academic.oup.com/wber/article-abstract/28/1/162/1678056],
 +
: [http://academic.oup.com/wber/article-abstract/28/1/162/1678056 http://academic.oup.com/wber/article-abstract/28/1/162/1678056],
 +
: [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2096026 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2096026],
 +
: [https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/9314 https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/9314],
 +
: [https://documents.shihang.org/curated/zh/277401468331247210/Policy-barriers-to-international-trade-in-services-evidence-from-a-new-database https://documents.shihang.org/curated/zh/277401468331247210/Policy-barriers-to-international-trade-in-services-evidence-from-a-new-database],
 +
: [https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:6109 https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:6109],
 +
: [https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/6109.html https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/6109.html],
 +
: [http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/42589 http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/42589],
 +
: [https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/22561/wber_28_1_162.pdf;sequence=1 https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/22561/wber_28_1_162.pdf;sequence=1],
 +
: [https://documents.vsemirnyjbank.org/curated/ru/277401468331247210/Policy-barriers-to-international-trade-in-services-evidence-from-a-new-database https://documents.vsemirnyjbank.org/curated/ru/277401468331247210/Policy-barriers-to-international-trade-in-services-evidence-from-a-new-database],
 +
: [https://documents.albankaldawli.org/curated/ar/277401468331247210/Policy-barriers-to-international-trade-in-services-evidence-from-a-new-database https://documents.albankaldawli.org/curated/ar/277401468331247210/Policy-barriers-to-international-trade-in-services-evidence-from-a-new-database],
 +
: [https://wber.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/1/162.abstract https://wber.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/1/162.abstract],
 +
: [https://www.scipedia.com/public/Borchert_et_al_2013a https://www.scipedia.com/public/Borchert_et_al_2013a],
 +
: [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2168266488 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2168266488]
  
  
  
 
DOIS: 10.1093/wber/lht017 10.1596/1813-9450-6109
 
DOIS: 10.1093/wber/lht017 10.1596/1813-9450-6109

Revision as of 17:22, 21 January 2021

Abstract

Surprisingly little is known about policies that affect international trade in services. Previous analyses have focused on policy commitments made by countries in international agreements but these commitments do not in many cases reflect actual policy. This paper describes a new initiative to collect comparable information on services trade policies for 103 countries, across a range of service sectors and the relevant modes of service delivery. The resultant database reveals interesting patterns in policy. Across regions, some of the fastest growing countries in Asia and the oil-rich Gulf states have the most restrictive policies in services, whereas some of the poorest countries are remarkably open. Across sectors, professional and transportation services are among the most protected in both industrial and developing countries, while retail, telecommunications and even finance tend to be more open. An illustrative set of results suggests that trade policies matter for investment flows and access to services. In particular, restrictions on foreign acquisitions, discrimination in licensing, restrictions on the repatriation of earnings and lack of legal recourse all have a significant and sizable negative effect, reducing the expected value of sectoral foreign investment by $2.2 billion over a 7-year period, compared with"open"policy regimes. In terms of access to services, credit as a share of gross domestic product is on average 3.3 percentage points lower in countries with major restrictions on the establishment of foreign banks as compared with those that only impose operational restrictions.

Document type: Preprint

Full document

The URL or file path given does not exist.


Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/wber/lht017
https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.1093/wber/lht017,
https://academic.oup.com/wber/article-abstract/28/1/162/1678056,
http://academic.oup.com/wber/article-abstract/28/1/162/1678056,
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2096026,
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/9314,
https://documents.shihang.org/curated/zh/277401468331247210/Policy-barriers-to-international-trade-in-services-evidence-from-a-new-database,
https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:6109,
https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/6109.html,
http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/42589,
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/22561/wber_28_1_162.pdf;sequence=1,
https://documents.vsemirnyjbank.org/curated/ru/277401468331247210/Policy-barriers-to-international-trade-in-services-evidence-from-a-new-database,
https://documents.albankaldawli.org/curated/ar/277401468331247210/Policy-barriers-to-international-trade-in-services-evidence-from-a-new-database,
https://wber.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/1/162.abstract,
https://www.scipedia.com/public/Borchert_et_al_2013a,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2168266488


DOIS: 10.1093/wber/lht017 10.1596/1813-9450-6109

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2013

Volume 2013, 2013
DOI: 10.1093/wber/lht017
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 1
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?