You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
You can view and copy the source of this page.
== Abstract ==
Policy makers have proposed various incentive programs to curb consumption-related problems, such as traffic congestion and carbon emissions. While experts consider such programs effective in reducing those problems, consumers are more skeptical. Although this "effectiveness skepticism" is currently viewed as an important cause of public opposition, the authors argue that it may also arise as a consequence of opposition. Specifically, consumers oppose policies they consider personally unattractive or unfair. This opposition motivates them to also be skeptical about the potential effectiveness of such policies. Three studies that include a variety of methods, policies, and samples provide empirical support for this reasoning: perceptions of expected effects can be biased by consumers' perceptions of personal attractiveness and fairness. In line with this causal ordering, the authors find that offering optimistic effectiveness estimates, although successful in reducing effectiveness skepticism, did not boost policy support. Policy makers aiming to boost support prior to implementation should thus not only communicate a policy's effectiveness, but also address other causes of opposition.
== Original document ==
The different versions of the original document can be found in:
* [http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jppm.16.118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jppm.16.118]
* [https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/en/publications/understanding-effectiveness-skepticism(9ab61e1d-f7f1-4891-8804-6d68cf4b367c).html https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/en/publications/understanding-effectiveness-skepticism(9ab61e1d-f7f1-4891-8804-6d68cf4b367c).html]
* [http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1509/jppm.16.118 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1509/jppm.16.118],
: [http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1509/jppm.16.118 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1509/jppm.16.118],
: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jppm.16.118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jppm.16.118] under the license http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license
* [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1509/jppm.16.118 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1509/jppm.16.118],
: [https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/publications/understanding-effectiveness-skepticism(9ab61e1d-f7f1-4891-8804-6d68cf4b367c).html https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/publications/understanding-effectiveness-skepticism(9ab61e1d-f7f1-4891-8804-6d68cf4b367c).html],
: [https://journals.ama.org/doi/full/10.1509/jppm.16.118 https://journals.ama.org/doi/full/10.1509/jppm.16.118],
: [https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/publications/understanding-effectiveness-skepticism https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/publications/understanding-effectiveness-skepticism],
: [http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1509/jppm.16.118 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1509/jppm.16.118],
: [https://www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai%3Apure.rug.nl%3Apublications%2F9ab61e1d-f7f1-4891-8804-6d68cf4b367c https://www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai%3Apure.rug.nl%3Apublications%2F9ab61e1d-f7f1-4891-8804-6d68cf4b367c],
: [https://core.ac.uk/display/132738766 https://core.ac.uk/display/132738766],
: [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2765109808 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2765109808]
Return to Woerdman et al 2017a.