You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

You are not allowed to execute the action you have requested.


You can view and copy the source of this page.

x
 
1
2
3
'''Purpose:'''  For patient with localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma, radical nephrourectomy and bladder cuff excision (RNU+BCE) was the standard treatment. In recent years, robot-assisted RNU and BCE (RaRNU+BCE) had been another choice of surgical intervention. This article was aimed to analyse the efficacy and peri-operative outcomes regarding RaRNU+BCE by this single institutional experience.      
4
5
'''Materials and Methods:'''  From March 2012 to November 2015, total 54 patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma were treated with RaRBU+BCE at Taipei Veterans General Hospital. We collected demographic data, histopathological reports, and peri-operative complications.      
6
7
'''Results:'''  Total 54 patients were included in our study. The mean age was 71.9 ± 9.9 (range 48–88) and the mean body mass index was 23.5 ± 2.9 (range 16.4–30.8). Median operative time was 314 min. (RaRNU:133.9 ± 41.4 mins, RaBCE: 72.9 ± 25.7 mins). The first docking time was 26.8 ± 7.7 mins and the second docking time was 16.5 ± 6.7 mins. Median bleeding volume was 87.7 ml. Pathological stage distribution was 27.8%, 7.4%, 31.5%, 13.0%, 33.3% and 5.6% in pTa, pTis, pT1, pT2, pT3 and pT4, respectively. Complications occurred in 7 cases (13%), with 4 grade I and 3 grade II by Clavien-Dindo classification.      
8
9
'''Conclusion:'''  Our experience showed RaRNU+BCE is an technically feasible and safe procedure for selected patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
10

Return to Tai et al. 2016a.

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 04/10/16

Licence: Other

Document Score

0

Views 7
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?