You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

You are not allowed to execute the action you have requested.


You can view and copy the source of this page.

x
 
1
2
3
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
4
D. Lastra Gil, C. García Nieto, S. Crespo Peña, E. Guinaldo Fernández, P. Cebolla Garrofe, F. J. Honorato Ruiz</div>
5
6
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
7
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Departamento de Investigación y Tecnología, Airbus Operations S.L., Paseo John Lennon s/n, 28906 Getafe, Madrid</span></div>
8
9
{| style="width: 87%;border-collapse: collapse;" 
10
|-
11
|  colspan='2'  style="vertical-align: top;"|<big>Aplicabilidad de tecnologías de inyección de fibra corta a partes aeronáuticas de baja responsabilidad estructural</big>
12
|-
13
|  style="border-bottom: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;"> [[Image:Gil_et_al_2018c-image1.png|54px]] </span>
14
|  style="vertical-align: top;"|
15
|-
16
|  style="border-top: 1pt solid black;border-bottom: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Historia del artículo:</span>
17
18
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Recibido 5 de Mayo 2017</span>
19
20
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">En la versión revisada 5 de Mayo 2017</span>
21
22
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Aceptado 31 de Mayo 2017</span>
23
24
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Accesible online 21 de Junio 2017 </span>
25
|  rowspan='4' style="vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">El desarrollo de partes estructurales altamente optimizadas en peso y coste siempre fue una constante en la industria aeroespacial. Sin embargo, dichas premisas (peso y coste) nunca fueron exclusivas de la misma. Un análisis focalizado en el sector de la automoción volvió a hacer resurgir una oportunidad abordada en el pasado: el uso de tecnologías de inyección de fibra corta. Los bajos costes recurrentes, las altas cadencias de producción y la repetitividad de los procesos suponían notables incentivos para la aplicabilidad de las tecnologías de inyección en partes aeronáuticas de baja responsabilidad estructural. Tomando como referencias elementos estructurales de los estabilizadores horizontales, diversos análisis de ingeniería (incluyendo procesos de diseño y cálculo) fueron realizados. De forma conjunta a estas investigaciones, diversos estudios de fabricación fueron desarrollados. Las conclusiones de ambas investigaciones, unidas a las pertinentes evaluaciones de pesos y costes, confirmaron la existencia de potenciales aplicaciones de presente y futura implementación. </span>
26
27
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Los desarrollos anteriores se incluyeron dentro del proyecto FACTORIA, financiado por el Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, a través del Centro Tecnológico Industrial (CDTI), en el marco del Programa Estratégico CIEN 2016.</span>
28
29
30
|-
31
|  style="border-top: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Palabras clave:</span>
32
33
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Aeronáutica</span>
34
35
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Responsabilidad estructural</span>
36
37
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Inyección</span>
38
39
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Fibra corta</span>
40
|-
41
|  style="border-top: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|
42
|-
43
|  colspan='2'  style="vertical-align: top;"|<big>Applicability of Short Carbon Fiber technology to aeronautical structural parts of low responsibility </big>
44
|-
45
|  style="border-bottom: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;"> [[Image:Gil_et_al_2018c-image2.png|54px]] </span>
46
|  style="vertical-align: top;"|
47
|-
48
|  style="border-top: 1pt solid black;border-bottom: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Keywords:</span>
49
50
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Aeronautic</span>
51
52
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Structural responsibility</span>
53
54
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Injection</span>
55
56
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">Short fiber</span>
57
|  rowspan='2' style="vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">The development of structural parts optimized in weight and cost has always been a key aspect in the aeronautical industry. Nevertheless, these premises also appears in other industries. A specific study focused on the automative industry showed the possibility of re-studying a technology analyzed in the past: Short Carbon Fiber injection. The technology offered low recurring costs, high rate possibilities and reliable repetitivity of the processes. Based on these statements, aeronautical parts from the Horizontal Tail Plane (</span><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">THS) with low structural responsibility were defined as target options. After defining the scope, different engineering and manufacturing studies were performed. The conclusions from both investigations, together with weight and cost estimations, confirmed the potential application of the technology for a present and future implementation.</span>
58
59
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">The previous project was included in the project FACTORIA, funded by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, by means of the Centro Tecnológico Industrial (CDTI), in the Strategic Programme CIEN 2016.</span>
60
61
62
|-
63
|  style="border-top: 1pt solid black;vertical-align: top;"|
64
|}
65
66
67
==1 Introduction==
68
69
The injection moulding process is a well-known manufacturing process in the automotive industry for producing plastic injection moulds from plastic materials. The material is fed into a heated barrel, mixed, and forced into a mould cavity by a reciprocating screw or a ram injector, where the injection moulded part cools and hardens to the configuration of the mould cavity. The injection moulding process presents several advantages in terms of recurring cost, lead time and parts repetitivity. On the other hand, injection plastics present low stiffness properties and the required clamping force to close the mould increases with the part surface or size and the injection pressure.
70
71
Assuming the previous state of the art, the Trimmable Horizontal Stabilizer (THS) tips are selected as potential application of this technology in the aerospace industry due to their low structural responsibility and relative small size. The objective of this work is to study the structural performance of a THS tip part made of injection thermoplastic materials reinforced with short fibers, manufactured in one-shot by means of injection moulding process. Furthermore, this study aims to identify which type of configuration or architecture is more efficient in terms of weight for different aircraft size, taking into account the structural requirements. Additionally, in order to assess the scale factor, Single Aile (SA) and Long Range (LR) are taken as reference of different size aircrafts.
72
73
==2 THS Tip Trade- off Study==
74
75
Three different configurations for the SA and LR THS tips, made of injection thermoplastic materials reinforced with short fibers, were studied in this work:
76
77
* '''Configuration 1''': an outer shell made of one sole skin.
78
79
* '''Configuration 2''': an outer shell (skin) reinforced with integrated ribs/spars.
80
81
* '''Configuration 3''': an outer shell (skin) stiffened with an integrated iso-grid system.
82
83
==='''2.1''' SA THS Tip===
84
85
SA THS tip (see '''Figure 1''') is a metallic sheet construction comprised of the following parts:
86
87
* 2 formed aluminium skin panels welded at the middle section.
88
89
* 5 aluminium form reinforcing ribs with lightening holes and riveted to the skin.
90
91
The tip is joined to the THS torsion box and leading edge by means of countersunk rivets.
92
93
94
[[Image:Gil_et_al_2018c-picture-Canvas 22.svg|center|600px]]
95
96
<span id='_Ref452457467'></span><span id='_Toc452381136'></span><div id="_Toc459969150" class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
97
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 1.''' SA THS Tip metallic structure</span></div>
98
99
==='''2.2''' LR THS Tip===
100
101
LR THS tip is a metallic typical box construction made up by spars and ribs to which the external skin panels are fastened to, comprising the following parts (see '''Figure 2'''):
102
103
* Aluminium skin panels of different thicknesses.
104
105
* Aluminium ribs and spars in chord and wingspan directions containing lightening holes. They are attached to the skin panels by means of blind fasteners.
106
107
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
108
109
[[Image:Gil_et_al_2018c-picture-Canvas 34.svg|center|600px]]
110
</div>
111
112
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
113
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 2.''' LR THS Tip metallic structure</span></div>
114
115
Upper and lower tip skin panels are fastened to the torsion box and leading edge by means of a single row or removable screws and nuts.
116
117
==='''2.3''' Configuration proposals for injection moulding process===
118
119
These configurations consisted of a single part forming the tip skin and integrating different internal elements or not, as shown in '''Figure 3 '''were studied.
120
121
As preliminary approach, these tips are supposed to be manufactured in one-shot by injection moulding process and attached to the torsion box and leading edge by the same fastener system as the reference, in order to ensure the interchangeability with current design.
122
123
As baseline, the external surface was protected against Lightning Strike events by means of Expanded Copper Foil (ECF) also integrated during the injection process.
124
125
126
[[Image:Gil_et_al_2018c-picture-Canvas 9.svg|center|600px]]
127
128
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
129
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 3.''' SA / LR THS Tips configuration proposals</span></div>
130
131
==='''2.4''' Load Cases===
132
133
The tips were loaded under a variable pressure distribution along its own chord and span. Two different type of load cases based on SA and LR THS tips envelopes were evaluated depending on the failure modes, phenomena and design details to be considered
134
135
====2.4.1 Critical Ultimate Load Cases====
136
137
Maximum values of ultimate load pressures for the critical load cases were considered in order to demontrace compliance to static strength
138
139
====2.4.2 Cruise Load Cases====
140
141
Cruise airloads were taken into account to demonstrate that the maximum deflection of the tip did not exceed the aerodynamic tolerances for external surfaces under cruise condition (according to the programme Technical Design Directives).
142
143
Maximum values of limit load pressure for cruise condition were taken from the pressure curve at box and tip joint span sections provided by the aerodynamic department.
144
145
==='''2.5''' Materials===
146
147
Material selected for the different tip configurations made by injection moulding process was a high performance Short Carbon Fiber Thermoplastic.
148
149
Material was considered as isotropic for the preliminary analysis in this work.
150
151
==='''2.6''' Sizing methodology===
152
153
The following hypotheses were made in order to simplify the calculations and reduce the number of uncertainties on the whole process:
154
155
* Minimum thickness of 1,0 mm was considered due to the limitation in pressure required in the injection moulding process for thinner sections.
156
157
* The internal elements configurations were designed making it compatible with moulding and demoulding solutions, taking into account the possibility of using flexible moulds.
158
159
* Thickness was variable along skin and internal elements and not necessarily symmetrical, it means, upper and lower skin were sized with different thickness distribution.
160
161
* Quasi-equilateral triangular isogrid was selected due to its optimal efficiency in terms of loads distribution.
162
163
* As stated before, SCFTP material was considered as isotropic in the calculations, because the micro-structure of the part (fibre orientation and concentration) depended on the injection process which was not known yet. The properties in transverse direction to the fiber orientation could decrease up to 40% and this anisotropic behaviour shall be taken into account in further analysis.
164
165
* Thermal loads were not considered in the calculations, as all the tip structure was made up from the same thermoplastic material with equivalent coefficients of thermal expansion. No degradation was expected in material stiffness properties within the operation temperature range from -55 to 90 ºC (lower than the material Glass Transition Temperature, T<sub>g</sub> = 140 ºC).
166
167
* Tips were considered as simply supported along the attachment lines to the torsion boxes and leading edges.
168
169
Detailed Finite Element Models (DFEM) were created for each of the configurations showed in '''Figure 3'''. THS Tips are categorized as structure D and structure C for the SA and LR respectively. Taking into account this categorization, the following failure modes, phenomena and design details were considered:
170
171
:* Aerodynamic '''stiffness/deflection''' under cruise limit loads.
172
173
:* '''Static strength''' at ultimate load levels.
174
175
:* '''Joint analysis''' at ultimate load levels.
176
177
:* Protection against '''lightning strike''' events.
178
179
==3 Results==
180
181
==='''3.1''' Sizing results===
182
183
'''Figure 4''' shows the results associated with SA proposals. The aerodynamic stiffness/deflection criteria was found as sizing driver, defining the thicknesses for each alternative.
184
185
[[Image:Gil_et_al_2018c-image17.png|600px]]
186
187
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
188
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 4.''' SA THS Tip – Sizing results for the different proposals</span></div>
189
190
For the LR configuration, '''Figure 5''' illustrates the results. The aerodynamic stiffness/deflection criteria was, as in SA case, the sizing driver.
191
192
[[Image:Gil_et_al_2018c-image20.png|600px]]
193
194
[[Image:Gil_et_al_2018c-image21.png|600px]]
195
196
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
197
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 5.''' LR THS Tip – Sizing results for the different proposals</span></div>
198
199
==='''3.2''' Lightning Strike Protection===
200
201
Tips are one of the most impacted areas by lightning strike attachments with long hang-on. The protection philosophy used for the composite tip of the torsion box in the standard LR THS was applied, i.e., Expanded Copper Foil (ECF). Further improved solutions as metallization or solid copper foil were under development.
202
203
==='''3.3''' Mass estimation===
204
205
Weight estimations were performed for SA and LR THS Tips Note that the weight estimations of the new sized configurations were FEM weights, while the reference tips weights were the real ones. Additionally, it must be remarked that only static sizing FEM weights were considered. Reinforcement at stringer feet, extra thickness due to demoulding angles and other extra weight should be added due to design and manufacturing requirements.
206
207
Tendencies of the weight impact for the different configurations under study as per Figure 3 are indicated in Table 1 for SA and LR
208
209
<br/>
210
211
{| style="width: 84%;margin: 1em auto 0.1em auto;border-collapse: collapse;" 
212
|-
213
|  style="border: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Configuration'''</span>
214
|  style="border: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''SA Weight Impact'''</span>
215
|  style="border: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''LR Weight Impact'''</span>
216
|-
217
|  style="border: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Only Skin'''</span>
218
|  style="border: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''+12%'''</span>
219
|  style="border: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''+110%'''</span>
220
|-
221
|  style="border: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''4 Intergrated Ribs'''</span>
222
|  style="border: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''-16%'''</span>
223
|  style="border: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''-7%'''</span>
224
|-
225
|  style="border: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Isogrid'''</span>
226
|  style="border: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''-13%'''</span>
227
|  style="border: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;vertical-align: top;"|<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''+92%'''</span>
228
|}
229
230
231
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
232
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Table 4.''' SA & LR THS Tip – Mass results</span></div>
233
234
==='''3.4''' Manufacturing assessment===
235
236
Initial manufacturing studies were performed during the project.
237
238
After finishing the first engineering activities, some manufacturing studies and flow simulations were developed in order to assess the injection process (see '''Figure 6'''). Some results from this research were the following ones:
239
240
:* Size of the parts under study are close to the upper limit for this kind of process
241
242
:* Minimizing the thickness variations was identified as a must in order to avoid internal defects.
243
244
:* Thicknesses of the reinforcements should be less than 60% of the shell thickness.
245
246
:* Low thicknesses (~1mm) in wide areas implied issues for the plastic flow and the filling process.
247
248
:* Demoulding trials should be performed in order to validate the manufacturing process.
249
250
251
[[Image:Gil_et_al_2018c-picture-Canvas 45.svg|center|600px]]
252
253
<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
254
<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figura 6.''' Manufacturing studies</span></div>
255
256
==='''1.1''' Preliminary test under development===
257
258
An initial material coupon test campaign in order to have a first assessment on the joint behavior of this material type is in process, mainly bearing and pull-trough coupons.
259
260
In addition fatigue un-notched coupons are being tested under different types of loading and stress profile.
261
262
==4 Conclusions and way forward==
263
264
SA and LR THS Tips analyses offer the following conclusions:
265
266
:* For the tips, the sizing driver is the fulfilment of aerodynamic tolerances for external surfaces.
267
268
:* The solutions based on skin with isogrid and skin reinforced with ribs are the most efficient solutions in terms of weight for the SA. In terms of cost, the discussion is open due to the configuration complexity and the tooling non-recurring costs.
269
270
:* The solution based on skin reinforced with ribs is the most efficient solution in terms of weight for the LR. Nevertheless, it is not competitive in comparison with the state of the art solution for this aircraft.
271
272
As way forward, the following activities are defined:
273
274
:* A detailed study on different SCFTP materials regarding different failure modes such as bearing and pull-through allowables, along with creep modulus and notched fatigue specimens are needed to have a complete picture complementary to this work.
275
276
:* Simulation and test of fibre orientation and non-homogeneities in function of the mould and injection design must be performed to have an initial assessment on the anisotropy effect  for SA scope.
277
278
:* Alternative solutions for Lightning Strike Protection can be considered.
279
280
==Acknowledgments==
281
282
The previous project was included in the project FACTORIA, funded by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, by means of the Centro Tecnológico Industrial (CDTI), in the Strategic Programme CIEN 2016.
283
284
==References==
285
286
[1] Internal References. Confidential.
287

Return to Gil et al 2018c.

Back to Top
GET PDF

Document information

Published on 29/04/18
Accepted on 29/04/18
Submitted on 29/04/18

Volume 02 - Comunicaciones Matcomp17 (2018), Issue Num. 2 - Aplicaciones y compuestos multifuncionales, 2018
DOI: 10.23967/r.matcomp.2018.04.002
Licence: Other

Document Score

0

Views 1
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?