You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

You are not allowed to execute the action you have requested.


You can view and copy the source of this page.

x
 
1
== Abstract ==
2
3
In this work we compare two apparently different stabilization procedures for the finite element approximation of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. The first is the characteristic‐based split (CBS). It combines the characteristic Galerkin method to deal with convection dominated flows with a classical splitting technique, which in some cases allows us to use equal velocity–pressure interpolations. The second approach is the Galerkin‐least‐squares (GLS) method, in which a least‐squares form of the element residual is added to the basic Galerkin equations. It is shown that both formulations display similar stabilization mechanisms, provided the stabilization parameter of the GLS method is identified with the time step of the CBS approach. This identification can be understood from a formal Fourier analysis of the linearized problem.
4
5
<pdf>Media:Draft_Samper_408825588_2254_Codina_et_al-2002-Communications_in_Numerical_Methods_in_Engineering (1).pdf</pdf>
6

Return to Codina Zienkiewicz 2001a.

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2001

DOI: 10.1002/cnm.470
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Times cited: 44
Views 18
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?