Abstract

This article investigates how persuasive syntactic structures embedded in AI-generated crypto whitepapers function as a vehicle of financial authority. Drawing from a curated corpus of 10,000 whitepapers linked to token launches between January 2022 and March 2025, we apply transformer-based dependency parsing to extract high-weighted grammatical features, including nested conditionals, modality clusters, and assertive clause chaining. We operate these patterns via a ''Deceptive Syntax Anomaly Detector'' (DSAD), which computes a syntactic risk index and identifies recurrent grammar configurations statistically correlated with anomalous capital inflows and subsequent collapses (Spearman correlation, ρ > 0.4, p < 0.01). Unlike prior studies focused on semantic deception or metadata irregularities, we model ''syntactic sovereignty'', the systematic use of syntax to establish non-human authority, as the groundwork of investor persuasion. We find that abrupt shifts in syntactic entropy, especially in modal intensifiers and future-perfect projections, consistently occur in documents associated with short-lived or fraudulent tokens. The article concludes by proposing a falsifiable governance framework based on fair-syntax enforcement (the principled correction of misleading grammatical patterns), including a corrective rewrite engine and syntactic risk disclosures embedded in compiled registration rules (''reglas compiladas'').