Abstract

Pipeline river crossings pose a significant challenge for pipeline owners and environmental regulators to balance the associated costs and risks, particularly where environmental impacts may occur. For years, NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. (NGTL) has managed the regulatory approval process using a well-established process. However, regulatory expectations are increasingly neutral to the cost of crossing installations and are demanding a more thorough assessment of a wider variety of river crossing options, particularly trenchless technologies. As a result, NGTL has recently enhanced the internal process by incorporating a structured decision tool. This tool is able to quantitatively assess technical risks as well as ‘soft’ influences such as “Regulatory Relationship” and “Delay in Approval”. The result is a clear decision with the necessary buy-in, where all risks were identified quantitatively and well understood by decision makers.Copyright © 1998 by ASME


Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ipc1998-2121
https://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleID=2572736,
http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2572736,
https://risk.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IPC/proceedings/IPC1998/40238/1023/258141,
https://nuclearengineering.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IPC/proceedings/IPC1998/40238/1023/258141,
https://computationalnonlinear.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IPC/proceedings/IPC1998/40238/1023/258141,
https://verification.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IPC/proceedings/IPC1998/40238/1023/258141,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2534401269
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/1998

Volume 1998, 1998
DOI: 10.1115/ipc1998-2121
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

Keywords

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?