Latest revision as of 14:31, 12 February 2021

Abstract

Autonomous vehicle (AV) is regarded as the ultimate solution to future automotive engineering; however, safety still remains the key challenge for the development and commercialization of the AVs. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the development status of AVs and reported accidents is becoming urgent. In this article, the levels of automation are reviewed according to the role of the automated system in the autonomous driving process, which will affect the frequency of the disengagements and accidents when driving in autonomous modes. Additionally, the public on-road AV accident reports are statistically analyzed. The results show that over 3.7 million miles have been tested for AVs by various manufacturers from 2014 to 2018. The AVs are frequently taken over by drivers if they deem necessary, and the disengagement frequency varies significantly from 2 × 10−4 to 3 disengagements per mile for different manufacturers. In addition, 128 accidents in 2014–2018 are studied, and about 63% of the total accidents are caused in autonomous mode. A small fraction of the total accidents (∼6%) is directly related to the AVs, while 94% of the accidents are passively initiated by the other parties, including pedestrians, cyclists, motorcycles, and conventional vehicles. These safety risks identified during on-road testing, represented by disengagements and actual accidents, indicate that the passive accidents which are caused by other road users are the majority. The capability of AVs to alert and avoid safety risks caused by the other parties and to make safe decisions to prevent possible fatal accidents would significantly improve the safety of AVs. Practical applications. This literature review summarizes the safety-related issues for AVs by theoretical analysis of the AV systems and statistical investigation of the disengagement and accident reports for on-road testing, and the findings will help inform future research efforts for AV developments.

Document type: Article

Full document

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

• http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8867757 under the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

• https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8867757

• http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jat/2020/8867757.pdf,

http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jat/2020/8867757.xml,

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8867757 under the license cc-by

• http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8867757,

https://doaj.org/toc/0197-6729,

https://doaj.org/toc/2042-3195 under the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

• https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jat/2020/8867757,

http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jat/2020/8867757.pdf,

[=citjournalarticle_661415_34 https://www.safetylit.org/citations/index.php?fuseaction=citations.viewdetails&citationIds[]=citjournalarticle_661415_34],

https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/3091936287