(Created page with "== Abstract == The non-linear analysis of historic masonry structures can be difficult to perform due to the highly irregular geometric features, the inherent variability wit...")
 
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 130885999 to Adamek Kabele 2021a)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 14:47, 30 November 2021

Abstract

The non-linear analysis of historic masonry structures can be difficult to perform due to the highly irregular geometric features, the inherent variability within the materials, as well as the limited amount of experimental data available. The present work details a specific methodology and result for the analysis of the compressive strength of the masonry found in walls of St. Ann’s Church in the Czech Republic. A multi-scale 2D finite element modelling approach was adopted. In a mesoscale-level representation of masonry, “small stones” were grouped in with the mortar and treated as a matrix component with homogenized properties, while large stones were treated as discrete inhomogeneities. To characterize this matrix component, microscale-level models were used, in which only the “small stones” and mortar were represented. By simulating uniaxial compression and tension tests on multiple microscalelevel models, statistical distributions for compressive and tensile strength, stiffness, and fracture energy were determined. On the mesoscale-level, overall stiffness and compressive strength were determined by simulating uniaxial compression tests on models involving only the large stones embedded in the homogenized matrix. The matrix was considered either as spatially uniform or variable. In the latter case, it was modeled with random fields based on the properties’ distributions obtained from the micro-scale model analyses. Furthermore, the multi-scale study was performed for two different threshold sizes defining the “small stones” to compare differences. Approximate qualitative methods were utilized to validate the results. Overall, decreasing compressive strength was observed from the plain mortar to the microscale model of mortar with “small stones” to the meso-scale model of masonry. Models where matrix variability was represented with random fields exhibited similar failure mechanisms but with strengths 5-6% lower than models with a uniform matrix. Therefore, the effect of the spatial variability of the matrix properties was deemed insignificant.

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document

References

[1] Zhang, S., Hofmann, M., & Beyer, K. (2018). A 2D typology generator for historical masonry elements. Construction and Building Materials, 184, 440–453.

[2] Lorenço, P. (1996). Computational Strategies for Masonry Structures. Delft University.

[3] Zhang, S., Taheri Mousavi, S. M., Richart, N., Molinari, J. F., & Beyer, K. (2017). Micromechanical finite element modeling of diagonal compression test for historical stone masonry structure. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 112, 122–132.

[4] Cluni, F., & Gusella, V. (2004). Homogenization of non-periodic masonry structures. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 41(7), 1911–1923.

[5] Falsone, G., & Lombardo, M. (2007). Stochastic representation of the mechanical properties of irregular masonry structures. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 44(25–26), 8600–8612.

[6] Gusella, V., & Federico, C. (2006). Random Field & Homogenization For Masonry With Nonperiodic Microstructure. Mechanics of Materials and Structures, 1(2), 357–386.

[7] Ostoja-Starzewski, M. (2006). Material spatial randomness: From statistical to representative volume element. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 21(2), 112–132.

[8] Drdácký, M., & Slížková, Z. (2008). Mechanical Characteristics of Historical Mortars from Tests on Small-Sample Non-Standard Specimens, (January).

[9] Válek, J., & Veiga, R. (2005). Characterisation of mechanical properties of historic mortars: testing of irregular samples. Transactions on the Built Environment, 83, 365–374. Retrieved from http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=17545867

[10] Červenka, V., Jendele, L., & Červenka, J. (2018). ATENA Program Documentation Part 1 Theory. Červenka Consulting. Prague.

[11] Havlasek, Petr, & Pukl, Radomir. (2015). RLACS Studio Structural Analysis and Reliability Assessment. Červenka Consulting. Prague.

[12] Borri, A., Corradi, M., Castori, G., & De Maria, A. (2015). Analysis and classification of historic masonry. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13(9), 2647–2665.

[13] NTC. (2008). Italian Ministry of Infrastructure and Transportation.

Back to Top
GET PDF

Document information

Published on 30/11/21
Submitted on 30/11/21

Volume Numerical modeling and structural analysis, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.256
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 7
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?